SCI/EI期刊投稿Reply Letter常用格式總結 整個論文投稿的過程中，會遇到各種問題，需要我們向主編詢問或是回複。下面主要總結了responses to the comments，以及催稿信的模闆。 1、回複信（Response Letter） 在期刊投稿中，首次錄用的比例相對較小，大部分的文章都會進行小修或是大修。如果是大修的話，就需要好好的修改文章，并認真的回複審稿人的意見。審稿人的意見一般都是比較有價值的。
1）常用格式：
Dear Editor,
We quite appreciate your favorite consideration and the reviewers’insightful comments concerning our manuscript entitled “XXXXXX” (ID：paper id). Those comments are very valuable and helpful for improving the quality and readability of our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our future researches. We have studied the comments carefully and have revised the paper exactly according to the reviewers’ comments. We hope this revision can meet with approval. The revised portions are marked in red in the paper and the main revisions corresponding to the reviewers’ comments are as follows:
注：
I. 在稱謂處，如果知道編輯的姓名，則用編輯的姓名，不要在知道編輯姓的情況下，還用editor這個統稱。
II. 将文章名和paper ID标注清楚。
III. 可在原文中将修改的部分明顯标注出來。
IV. 根據審稿人的意見逐個進行回答。
2）常用語句
在回答審稿人意見時，一般首先感謝審稿人，尊重審稿人的勞動。
如：
I. Thanks for your comments.The comments provide an important direction for us to revise our paper, the revised parts according to the comments as follows:
II. Thank you for your detailed comments. They point the deficiencies of our paper and the careless of us;moreover, it is significant to our future research. The revised parts that correspond to the comments are listed as follows:
然後逐個列出審稿人的意見，并給出詳細的回複。
I. It is really true as the reviewer commented that…
II. Thanks for your comment. It is the important deficiencies in this paper, wherefore …
III. Hope it can achieve your request. Special thanks to you for your good comments.
IV. Hope it can meet your request. Once again, special thanks to you for your good comments.
V. Considering the reviewer’s suggestion, we …
VI. We are very sorry for …. We went through the whole paper and corrected … we could find.
VII. As the reviewer suggested, …
3) 最後，感謝主編和審稿人的工作。
We are very grateful for your and reviewers’ warm work earnestly. In all, we found the reviewers’ comments are quite helpful. They point the deficiencies about our manuscript us, also the aspects that we have not done enough. It plays an important role in guiding for our future research, and helps us for further improvement.
We have tried our best to improve the manuscript and made extensive modification in the original manuscript according to the comments. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. Here did not list all the changes but marked in red in revised manuscript.
Thank you and the review again for your help, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
2、催稿信（Reminder Letter）
1）常用格式
Dear Editor,
We have submitted the manuscript as follows:
Paper id- 文章名
The above mentioned manuscript has been submitted for over X months, but we have not heard of any decision from the conference.
We will be most gratefulif you could let me know the current status of the manuscript.
Thank you very much for your consideration, and look forward to hearing from you soon.
With kind regards,
Yours sincerely,
XXX (name),
Your title,
Corresponding author. ---------------------------Example by Tsingke-------------------------------
Re: Manuscript reference No.: xxxxxxxx
Dear Professor XXXXXXX,
We are extremely appreciated for your kind reconsideration of our manuscript (XXXXXXXX), entitled “XXXXXXXXXXXXXX” in xxx Jounal xxx. We are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers’ useful and constructive comments on our manuscript. We carefully considered every comment and made cautious revision accordingly. In the following pages are our point-by-point responses to each of the comments of the reviewers. If you have any other questions about this paper, we would quite appreciate it if you could let us know them in the earliest possible time. We hope that the revisions in the manuscripts and our accompanying responses will be sufficient to make our manuscript suitable for publication. The following revision has been made based on the referees’ comments.
Responses to the comments of Reviewer #1:
Responses to the comments of Reviewer #2:
Responses to the comments of Reviewer #3:
We are very grateful for your and reviewers’ warm work earnestly. In all, we found the reviewers’ comments are quite helpful. They point the deficiencies about our manuscript us, also the aspects that we have not done enough. It plays an important role in guiding for our future research, and helps us for further improvement. We have tried our best to improve the manuscript and made extensive modification in the original manuscript according to reviewers’ comments. These changes in some degree not influence the content and framework of the paper. We appreciate for reviewer’s useful and constructive comments and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Thanks and Best Kind Regards,
Authors lists
June 3, 2016.