本文翻译自:How can I return an empty IEnumerable?
Given the following code and the suggestions given in this question , I've decided to modify this original method and ask if there are any values in the IEnumarable return it, if not return an IEnumerable with no values.
鉴于以下代码和此问题中给出的建议,我决定修改这个原始方法,并询问IEnumarable中是否有任何值返回它,如果没有返回没有值的IEnumerable。Here is the method:
这是方法:public IEnumerable<Friend> FindFriends()
{
//Many thanks to Rex-M for his help with this one.
//https://stackoverflow.com/users/67/rex-m
return doc.Descendants("user").Select(user => new Friend
{
ID = user.Element("id").Value,
Name = user.Element("name").Value,
URL = user.Element("url").Value,
Photo = user.Element("photo").Value
});
}
Since everything is inside the return statement, I don't know how I could do this.
由于一切都在return语句中,我不知道如何做到这一点。Would something like this work?
会这样的吗?public IEnumerable<Friend> FindFriends()
{
//Many thanks to Rex-M for his help with this one.
//https://stackoverflow.com/users/67/rex-m
if (userExists)
{
return doc.Descendants("user").Select(user => new Friend
{
ID = user.Element("id").Value,
Name = user.Element("name").Value,
URL = user.Element("url").Value,
Photo = user.Element("photo").Value
});
}
else
{
return new IEnumerable<Friend>();
}
}
The above method doesn't work, and in fact it's not supposed to;
上面的方法不起作用,事实上它不应该;I just feel it illustrates my intentions.
我觉得这说明了我的意图。I feel I should specify that the code doesn't work because you can't create an instance of an abstract class.
我觉得我应该指定代码不起作用,因为你不能创建一个抽象类的实例。Here is the calling code, I don't want it to receive a null IEnumerable at any time:
这是调用代码,我不希望它随时接收null IEnumerable:private void SetUserFriends(IEnumerable<Friend> list)
{
int x = 40;
int y = 3;
foreach (Friend friend in list)
{
FriendControl control = new FriendControl();
control.ID = friend.ID;
control.URL = friend.URL;
control.SetID(friend.ID);
control.SetName(friend.Name);
control.SetImage(friend.Photo);
control.Location = new Point(x, y);
panel2.Controls.Add(control);
y = y + control.Height + 4;
}
}
Thank you for your time.
感谢您的时间。#1楼
参考:https://stackoom.com/question/DYBu/我怎样才能返回一个空的IEnumerable
#2楼
You can use
list ?? Enumerable.Empty<Friend>()
你可以使用 list ?? Enumerable.Empty<Friend>()
list ?? Enumerable.Empty<Friend>()
, or have
FindFriends
return
Enumerable.Empty<Friend>()
list ?? Enumerable.Empty<Friend>()
,或让 FindFriends
返回 Enumerable.Empty<Friend>()
#3楼
您可以返回
Enumerable.Empty<T>()
。
#4楼
至于我,最优雅的方式是
yield break
#5楼
I think the simplest way would be
我认为最简单的方法是return new Friend[0];
The requirements of the return are merely that the method return an object which implements
IEnumerable<Friend>
.
返回的要求仅仅是该方法返回一个实现IEnumerable<Friend>
的对象。 The fact that under different circumstances you return two different kinds of objects is irrelevant, as long as both implement IEnumerable.
事实上,在不同情况下你返回两种不同类型的对象是无关紧要的,只要两者都实现IEnumerable。#6楼
That's of course only a matter of personal preference, but I'd write this function using yield return:
这当然只是个人偏好的问题,但我会使用yield return来编写这个函数:public IEnumerable<Friend> FindFriends()
{
//Many thanks to Rex-M for his help with this one.
//http://stackoverflow.com/users/67/rex-m
if (userExists)
{
foreach(var user in doc.Descendants("user"))
{
yield return new Friend
{
ID = user.Element("id").Value,
Name = user.Element("name").Value,
URL = user.Element("url").Value,
Photo = user.Element("photo").Value
}
}
}
}