laitimes

Case | Zhongchang Data Co., Ltd. wholly-owned subsidiary v. YimeiHuijin shareholders' right to know, the result of the first instance trial?

The special craftsman lawyer said that the case | a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zhongchang Big Data Co., Ltd. (listed company, 600242) sued the shareholders of Yimeihuijin for a dispute over the right to know, and the result of the first instance trial was as follows.

Case | Zhongchang Data Co., Ltd. wholly-owned subsidiary v. YimeiHuijin shareholders' right to know, the result of the first instance trial?

Zhongchang Big Data Co., Ltd. (listed company, 600242) released the announcement of 2021-063 on October 8, which disclosed the results of the first instance of the shareholder right to know lawsuit between Shanghai Yuchang Investment, a wholly-owned subsidiary, and Yimeihuijin Company, which is controlled by Shanghai Yuchang Investment.

According to the announcement, Shanghai Yuchang Investment Management Co., Ltd. filed a right-to-know lawsuit with the Chaoyang District People's Court of Beijing Municipality, requesting that the defendant Beijing Yimeihuijin Information Technology Co., Ltd. be ordered to provide financial accounting reports, accounting books (including general ledgers, detailed accounts, journals, and other auxiliary books) from January 1, 2018 to the present, accounting vouchers (including accounting vouchers, relevant original vouchers, and relevant materials recorded as attachments to the original vouchers), business materials (including purchase and sale contracts, settlement documents), and business materials (including purchase and sale contracts and settlement documents). Tax payment materials (including tax returns, tax payment certificates), business management systems (including inventory management systems, sales management caitong, financial management systems), and bank statements stamped and confirmed by each bank are for the plaintiff and the personnel with professional knowledge entrusted by the plaintiff to consult and copy.

First Instance Judgment:

(1) The defendant, Beijing Yimeihuijin Information Technology Co., Ltd., provided Shanghai Yuchang Investment Management Co., Ltd. with the articles of association, minutes of the shareholders' meeting, resolutions of the board of directors meeting, resolutions of the board of supervisors' meeting, and financial and accounting reports of the plaintiff, Shanghai Yuchang Investment Management Co., Ltd., from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020, at the business premises of Beijing Yimeihuijin Information Technology Co., Ltd. within 1 days after the judgment took effect; The defendant, Beijing Yimeihuijin Information Technology Co., Ltd., provided the accounting books of Beijing Yimeihuijin Information Technology Co., Ltd. for the period from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020 to Shanghai Yuchang Investment Management Co., Ltd. at the business premises of Beijing Yimeihuijin Information Technology Co., Ltd. within 10 days after the judgment took effect; (3) When the plaintiff, Shanghai Yuchang Investment Management Co., Ltd., reviewed the documents and materials in the first and second items above, it may entrust the accountant, Lawyers and other intermediary institution practitioners who have confidentiality obligations in accordance with law or in accordance with the code of conduct conduct shall assist in conducting them.

The above is only the result of the first instance, billions of dollars has been appealed, the outcome of the case is subject to the effective judgment. It is worth mentioning that Yimeihuijin was acquired by a listed company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Shanghai Yuchang Investment holds 55% of the equity of Yimeihuijin, but after the acquisition, it has repeatedly lost control, and if you want to obtain the company's financial situation, you can only achieve it by suing.

The above is for reference only.

Case | Zhongchang Data Co., Ltd. wholly-owned subsidiary v. YimeiHuijin shareholders' right to know, the result of the first instance trial?
Case | Zhongchang Data Co., Ltd. wholly-owned subsidiary v. YimeiHuijin shareholders' right to know, the result of the first instance trial?