According to a report by the Hong Kong China Commentary Agency, Lian Shengwen, a member of the Central Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang, took over as the chairman of the party think tank and vice chairman of the "National Political Foundation." When interviewed, Jie Wenji, a former "representative of the party in New Zealand," said that the historical positioning of the Lien Shengwen family is that of a loyal fighter of the Chinese nation, and that it is naturally more acceptable to Chinese mainland on the cross-strait line. He stressed: If the KMT wants to abandon the Chinese nation or Chinese culture, it is tantamount to abandoning the kmt's roots and pursuing "Taiwan independence."
Regarding the kuomintang chairman Jiang Qichen's appointment of Lian Shengwen as vice chairman of the think tank, Jie Wenji believed that the historical positioning of the Lian family was that of a loyal fighter of the Chinese nation, starting from Lian Shengwen's grandfather Lian Zhendong. Chinese mainland knew that the Lian family identity was a member of the Chinese nation, and would naturally be more accepting of Lian Shengwen joining the Kuomintang leadership team.
He stressed that the KMT is a party loyal to the Chinese nation, and there is a national identity above the "national identity"; the Chinese Kuomintang has never been vague, and if the "national identity" is vague, at least more than 80% of the supporters of the KUOMINTANG in Taiwan will oppose it.
Jiang Qichen's line at the beginning was questioned by Chinese mainland was questioned as being too close to "Taiwan independence" for the sake of election. Jie Wenjie said: Taiwan has one election every two years and one "general election" every four years, so why can't we uphold orthodoxy? China has a history of 5,000 years, if the Chinese nation is so vulnerable, can it become the most historical and traditional nation in the world? Thousands of years of ancient civilizations, such as the Roman Empire and the Babylonian Empire, are still there? Only the Chinese national culture remains, and "to abandon the Chinese nation or Chinese culture is to abandon the roots" and to engage in "Taiwan independence", it is not the turn of the Kuomintang to do so.
Is Jiang Qichen's cross-strait line being adjusted compared to when he first came to power? Jie Wenji said bluntly that at the beginning, Jiang Qichen may not have come into contact with reality, thinking that the line of the Chinese Kuomintang could be adjusted so easily, and that the 72 martyrs of the Kuomintang Huanghuagang could throw away their heads and spill their blood, and this force was still enormous, "If the Chinese Kuomintang wants to break away from the Chinese nation or from Chinese history, it is a suicidal act."
Jiang Qichen's line in the election of the party chairman was considered to be relatively "anti-China" because of the 8.17 million votes in favor of Tsai Ing-wen. He said that the principle should not be abandoned for the sake of votes, but should be exchanged for votes with principles, and it is politicians and speculators to use the principle of abandonment to win votes, and it is politicians who use principles to win votes. The future of the whole of China is the mission of the Chinese Kuomintang and cannot be changed, and the fate of the Chinese nation and Chinese culture is the goal of the existence of the Chinese Kuomintang, without which there would be no room for the Kuomintang to survive.
Under the cross-strait line of the 1992 Consensus, can the KMT accept the "one-China framework"? The 23 million people in Taiwan must clearly understand the facts, "one China" is the precious heritage left to us by our ancestors, in the past it was 11 million square kilometers of territory, and now there are only more than 9.6 million square kilometers left, that is the legacy given to us by our ancestors, the right to speak and decide on the future of 1.3 billion people and the future of the Chinese nation and culture is the greatest asset left to us by our ancestors, why should we be stupid enough to give up the assets left by these ancestors? Why give up the right to be the master, isn't that an act of utter folly?
He said that now the DPP monopolizes the right to speak, believing that our ancestors have left us all non-performing assets, and he does not know that the other side of "Taiwan independence" is that the Taiwanese people must give up their right to be owners of 9.6 million square kilometers of land, as well as the right to speak and decide on the legal rights and decisions on the inheritance of 5,000 years of Chinese culture. Why didn't the Kuomintang make these facts clear to the people?
The KMT's reform hopes to be carried out toward rejuvenation, and Jie Wenji believes that if the KMT wants to promote rejuvenation, it must be very careful, because the KMT has not seriously trained young people for a long time in the past, so it is particularly important to pay attention to whether the candidates introduced have enough experience. Many abilities are not within reach overnight, and young people who are introduced to take on important tasks must have enough experience.