Professor Hu Xingdou presided over the seminar
According to the information provided at the seminar, the Weihai Rongpeng Real Estate Company equity case involved the Weihai Intermediate Court's over-limit trial, judicial procedural issues at key nodes such as the performance of contractual obligations, evidence determination, and demolition determination, and the excessive discretion of the presiding judge, resulting in the trial result of the reversal of the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved in the case.
Zhan Zhongle, a famous scholar and professor at Peking University, vice president of the China Administrative Law Society, Professor of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, director of the Legal and Economic Research Center of Peking University, zhang Shuguang, editor-in-chief of the China Social Science Review, Wu Pi, professor of the School of Government and Management of Peking University, Zhou Hongling, a famous scholar, etc., Yang Xinhua, director of the All-China Lawyers Association, Zhan Zhongzhuo, Wang Gang, Zhang Xueming, chief editor of the China Law Channel, Huang Fengrong, editor-in-chief of the China Economic News Network, Jin Zhongbing, deputy editor-in-chief of the China Network Legal Channel, Present at the meeting were Ouyang Yongzheng, deputy editor-in-chief; Li Yueren, executive secretary general of Xinhua Net's grassroots activities; Ouyang Jin, a well-known media person and editor-in-chief of Hong Kong Pacific Magazine; Yao Yao, director of Value China Net; Zhu Xinmin, a senior media person and founder of the Complaint Network; Liu Limin, a senior reporter of legal daily rule of law weekend; and He Bin, director of the senior leadership information network; and other experts, scholars, lawyers, and reporters.
Experts, scholars and lawyers present conducted academic discussions on the legal and economic issues in the company's equity dispute case, and expressed their opinions.
Zhan Zhongle, a well-known scholar, vice president of the China Administrative Law Research Association, and professor at Peking University, also made a speech. He mainly emphasized three points: First, as long as the content of the contract does not violate the laws and regulations of the state, the content of the contract should be valid; 2. The right to decide on the change of the building volume ratio lies with the competent government departments, not within the ability of the company's individuals; 3. There are obvious tendencies and procedural violations in the use of evidence in the course of court trial.
Zhan Zhongzhuo, a well-known lawyer, believes that one of the cores of this case is that there are huge differences in the determination of relevant evidence, and a common standard should be determined in the identification standard.
The experts at the scene had a heated discussion on the current problems in the judicial circles and local judicial practices, and generally believed that in view of the abuse of public power, the violation of the law and judicial corruption in some fields, it is very necessary to use media power and social forces to jointly form a strong supervisory force to jointly promote China's rule of law towards justice and fairness.
According to Hu Xingdou, the founder of the --- Property Protection Forum, the initiator of the China Problems and the Economics of Vulnerable Groups, and a professor of economics at Beijing Institute of Technology, the "Property Protection Forum" has long been concerned about vulnerable groups, committed to the development of private enterprises, private economy and property protection research, and adhered to the principles of fairness, public welfare, rationality and the rule of law, with the aim of improving China's civil and commercial environment and promoting the progress of the rule of law.
Experts and scholars spoke highly of the fruitful work achievements of the Property Protection Public Welfare Forum and expressed their continued support for the concepts and behaviors of the Forum. (Jin Zhongbing)