Start with Allen and technical fouls

November 4, 2021 CBA Basketball League Liaoning vs Shanxi, originally a mediocre game, because Guo Allen of the Liaoning men's basketball team was dissatisfied with the referee's decision in the game, and was expelled from the field after two consecutive technical fouls, and was instantly sent to the hot search.

Referees on the field of misjudgment is inevitable, and from time to time, basketball games, often see players, coaches or other staff of the team for the referee to be dissatisfied with the decision and fierce protest and be judged to technical fouls, and even sometimes in their own side behind and is rising to chase points, such a critical moment due to the penalty of technical fouls to interrupt the rhythm of the side, resulting in losing the game, I believe that everyone often watch the game, should have seen it, this kind of thing is really not cost-effective.

Allen on the field, outstanding technical ability, key moments dare to take responsibility, desire to win and sense of competition are top-notch, but in questioning the referee has suffered too much loss, if you can not affect the referee's decision on the field, then as the Liaoning men's basketball team's tactical initiator, the first scorer, the absolute core player in the team, what Allen needs to do is to do his best to stay on the court, which is the biggest help to the team.

This is not related to courage, everything is for victory, competitive competition, brave charge in the face of strong enemies is of course a kind of courage, to overcome self-emotions, first ensure that they stay on the field, use their own strength to defeat opponents, this is also a kind of courage. Of course, due to the large difference in strength between the two sides in this game, and the team was already leading by a large margin at that time, it had no impact on the final result. In this judgment, Allen did not express fierce words and body language in the whole process of questioning, and the second technical judgment could not be said to be unreasonable, but it was too strict.

The referee's unfair judgment is not impossible to question, but to grasp the time of questioning, the way of questioning, the degree of expression of doubt, can not leave the referee with a reason to further expand the situation, the important point is that the referee is the interpreter of the rules on the court, and the technical penalty is different from ordinary fouls, it not only has the standard of the rules, but also by the situation at that time, the subjective determination of the referee and other comprehensive factors.

The post-match speech directed by Yang Ming is very commendable, taking into account the overall situation? Protecting players? Or questioning the referee? It all depends on how the individual understands, this kind of speech will not be implemented at all, and Yang's guidance on this point is a good !!!

There is no absolute fairness in this world, and anger and resentment are meaningless, there is no absolute strength, and even the pursuit of fairness and justice is wrong. If you don't have the ability to overturn the rules, then try to save yourself within the rules, strengthen yourself, and wait for the coming day. Retreating is a bigger pattern that requires greater courage.

The road ahead is long, tortuous, full of obstacles, and the only thing you can do is never give up!