"Who is Liu Yu?" Neither men nor women are not very familiar and do not know. ”
As an anchor, don't even know the spokesperson of your own product? And blatantly speaking such obviously insulting language, are you disgusted that your career is too long?
The story goes something like this: On October 29, Liu Yu, a popular male artist, appeared in a brand live broadcast room to promote the goods he endorsed, and left the live broadcast room after finishing his work.
Shortly after he left, there were fans in the live broadcast room who left a message asking the anchor when Liu Yu would come back, and what everyone did not expect was that after the anchor who was broadcasting the live broadcast saw it, he even dismissively said, Who is Liu Yu? Neither men nor women are not very familiar and do not know.
At that time, the anchor sang a harmony with the faceless assistant broadcaster on the side, mocking Liu Yu for not being a man or a woman, saying that he did not like him.
Many netizens have expressed their views on this matter, questioning the professionalism of the two anchors, believing that they help people with goods but also say that others are not good, insulting the brand spokesperson, and disrespecting the brand side. Is this the attitude of working with money?
There are also a few people who said: There is a saying, I agree with the anchor's point of view, but do not agree with her approach.
Even if you hate it, as an anchor, at this time the position represents the brand side, is the window of the display, the mouth is not covered, which means that the brand side will make the brand side bear a lot of risks, people invite you to increase revenue, not let you smash the field, the society must be careful to do things!
The behavior of the anchor is indeed inappropriate, as a consumer-oriented "public figure", every word and deed is to convey values, so casually slander others, it is really not in compliance with public order and good customs.
I remembered that there was a live broadcast anchor who died of drinking medicine at the instigation of netizens, and some sighed. The threshold for speaking on the Internet is really too low, and it is said arbitrarily and willfully, without considering the feelings of others. The communication brought by the network is convenient, and it also encourages some people to watch the hilarity psychology, and the drama is not afraid of being too high. But they forgot what they said, and the water that was spilled out was hard to harvest.
For the two anchors involved, the brand responded: the cooperation has been terminated! And on October 30, the brand apologized in a post on the official platform, saying that it had terminated the cooperation with the company of the two anchors involved and reserved the right to jointly pursue legal responsibility with the spokesperson Liu Yu and his team. At the same time, the brand said that it will strengthen the cooperation and review of live broadcasting institutions and anchors in the future.
The company involved also apologized: immediately dismiss the two anchors and never hire them!
The company where the two anchors worked also issued an apology, saying that both anchors had undergone relevant training and worked in strict accordance with the norms and requirements of live broadcasting. In addition, the remarks of the two anchors in the live broadcast room that have nothing to do with the product and the brand's live broadcast work are purely personal statements and have nothing to do with the position of the brand side and the company.
I often say don't confuse life and work, and the Internet and the real world are very different. Casual ridicule and ridicule on the Internet may quickly drown out hundreds of comments, but in reality, there should be a number of people who should say what to say and what not to say.
While you may have no feelings for this star, or even for all traffic stars, since he has sincerely done his work in front of the camera, he should not be blamed for this. Taking a step back, even if there is a problem with his work attitude, you can accuse him of playing a big card, having a poor attitude, and the adjective "no man and no woman" is already a physical attack.
For the evaluation that has nothing to do with the content of the work in the work, which is an imprecise treatment of one's own work, then the boss can reasonably doubt whether the above situation will occur in the future work.
Again, don't let the internet turn us into mean and indifferent people! At the same time, I also hope that the anchor of this event can understand that whether it is work or dealing with people, basic professionalism and ethics should be observed. I hope that this incident will make her wake up instead of anger!