laitimes

Referring to Xie Libin's team strike, is the CBA League's punishment of Guo Shiqiang too double-standard?

author:Sports Super Front
Referring to Xie Libin's team strike, is the CBA League's punishment of Guo Shiqiang too double-standard?

On November 2, Beijing time, the CBA league official announced a heavy fine, first Zhao Rui was dissatisfied with the referee's judgment and angrily sprayed the referee, was expelled from the game by the referee for blowing two technical fouls in a row, due to the team's big score backward mood, Zhao Rui on the field still did not spare the referee, causing a bad impact on the CBA League, and then, the CBA League issued a fine Zhao Rui banned 1 game and fined 50,000! Such a judgment caused dissatisfaction among netizens!

Referring to Xie Libin's team strike, is the CBA League's punishment of Guo Shiqiang too double-standard?

Guo Shiqiang in referee theory

Another game Guangzhou and Jilin match, due to the referee's penalty mistakes, caused great dissatisfaction with Guangzhou team coach Guo Shiqiang, the most important thing is that The pace of Jilin player Dai Huaibo is too obvious, coupled with guangzhou lagging behind a point in urgent need of points, the emotional Guo Shiqiang has been negotiating with the referee and the technical station, asking the referee to re-watch the video, but the angry thing is that the referee turned a blind eye to Guo Shiqiang's request, which made Guo Shiqiang annoyed, resulting in a game interruption of nearly 10 minutes, it is said that the referee also started the strike procedure at that time. If the Guangzhou team does not return, they will be judged to lose the game 0:20, and finally the arm can not twist the thigh, Guangzhou returns to the game, but the Jilin players missed two penalties, the last moment Guangzhou player Chen Yingjun went to the basket to kill, although Guangzhou won, but a paper penalty ticket in the CBA League cast a shadow on the prospects of Guangzhou's future games, the fine is not to say, the team's head coach banned 5 games, which is undoubtedly unfavorable for Guangzhou, which aims to impact the playoffs.

Referring to Xie Libin's team strike, is the CBA League's punishment of Guo Shiqiang too double-standard?

Guo Shi powerful noisy technical station

We have a saying, Guo Shiqiang did delay the game + question the referee + make a big fuss about the technology, the penalty is no problem, but the CBA penalty result has a clear double standard, because last season, Beijing Shougang and Shenzhen in the last moment of the game, the referee blew Liu Xiaoyu for the three-point shooting foul on Booker, which directly led to Beijing Shougang being killed by the Shenzhen penalty, seeing that the victory of the hand was gone, the Shougang crowd will begin to make a big fuss about the technical platform, and the team's head coach Xie Libin is leading the team to strike, if it is not the persuasion of the player staff, Shougang crowd will probably not return to the stadium, Zhai Xiaochuan is even more noisy on the technical platform, and even angrily slapped the table of the technical platform, but the result is that? Xie Libin was suspended for 4 games, fined 20,000 yuan, and Zhai Xiaochuan, who has been making a big fuss about the technical platform, was fined 30,000 yuan and did not suspend, is it not more serious to lead the team to strike and have left the stadium than the interruption of the game caused by Guo Shiqiang's questioning of the penalty?

The most important thing is that this is an obvious missed judgment, and the referee's report after the game also shows this, which also makes Guo Shiqiang pay for the referee's mistake? Imagine if there was no misjudgment this time, would Guo Shiqiang still make a big fuss about the technical platform? If Guo Shiqiang admits that he is unlucky and silent, will the referee's wrong judgment be punished accordingly?

Here is the sports super front, a veteran basketball enthusiast, if you also like, follow me, let's discuss basketball fun!

Read on