Guo Shiqiang was banned for 5 games and fined 20,000 yuan! The CBA league has placed three "charges" on the head of the "old uncle", questioning the referee, dissatisfaction with the penalty and interfering with the game, it is worth mentioning that the Guangzhou team has launched an appeal.
What is puzzling is that less than 6 hours after the announcement of the penalty notice for Guo Shiqiang, the CBA released Guangzhou's penalty report on the Jilin match, clearly pointing out that Dai Huaibo's walking was a wrong omission.
In fact, even unprofessional fans can clearly see that this is a missed judgment, and the CBA executives will protect the calves without leading by example. Is it that hard for Referee No. 41 to admit his mistake? This is the first time yao Ming has supported Guo Shiqiang, at least to prove that "old uncle" is right, not unreasonable. Blame can only blame the CBA for challenging the referee rules with too many loopholes,
First, it is clearly stipulated that only four situations: foul, basket interference, interference ball violation and ball out of bounds can be challenged, why other ball violations cannot be a reason for challenge;
Secondly, in the last two minutes of the game, only fouls can be challenged, is this not a deliberate indulgence of the referee's scale of blowing penalties?
Third, even if the challenge is a suspension, if successful, the suspension will be retained, and vice versa will be deducted, which does not limit the enthusiasm of the coach's challenge, and the suspension plays an important role in the key moments of the game.
Obviously, so many rules are not fair and more biased towards referees. If you make a mistake, you must be punished, which is a matter of course. The Chinese Basketball Association also issued a circular criticism of the referee and technical representative on duty, and suspended the penalty for many games.
When the fans saw the news, it was still very warm, and this was the second time yao Ming supported Guo Shiqiang in a day. It is worth mentioning that the No. 41 referee is not a "small person", and many CBA coaches have suffered his losses.
Remember the guangdong match against Shougang, Du Feng was expelled from the field because he was dissatisfied with Hudson pushing and shoving Ren Junfei, and blew 2 technical fouls in 3 seconds.
Coincidentally, when Li Chunjiang was still in Guangsha, a game against Shenzhen, Li Muhao stopped for 6 seconds in the three-second zone, but the referee did not see it at all, and after Li Chunjiang proposed it, he also suffered a technical foul.
What is even more puzzling is that the No. 41 referee also angrily reprimanded Yang Qiu not to coach on the sidelines, and ordered him to sit on the bench, and the fans were really powerless to complain. After seeing yao Ming's ticket, the fans finally relieved, and the Chinese Basketball Association should punish this kind of referee who blows punishment with closed eyes and suppress their arrogance.
I have to say that "Uncle" is still a good coach who dares to speak, and dares to take responsibility in the face of unfair treatment.
Judging from the current situation, the Chinese Basketball Association is like a parent who has no advocacy, two small children have a fight, and they will play 50 boards first. In fact, this method of handling family chores is OK, but it still cannot achieve the effect of public events, which will only make people feel contradictory, and more and more people sympathize with Guo Shiqiang.
Guangzhou is currently in the B position in the standings with 5 wins and 2 losses, and the start is remarkable, but Guo Shiqiang's 5-game ban gives Xinjiang, Tongxi and Jilin the best time to "revenge". Do you think the CBA will remove the penalty for Guo Shiqiang?