<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right">01</h1>
Recently, a clip from the Polish film "Blood Warsaw" in Warsaw circulated on Weibo, WeChat and other social media.
Set against the backdrop of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising against Nazi Germany, "Bloody Warsaw" features many scenes depicting the Brutal Suppression of the Insurgents by the Germans, such as a rain of blood from the air after a major explosion, followed by human limbs and fragments falling like hailstones, giving the audience a strong shock.
What is puzzling is that the purpose of the people who forwarded these videos does not seem to be to indict the brutality of fascism, but to "oppose the war" and to scare the "main war faction" in China, so they usually accompany this text when they forward it.
"I don't know what kind of psychology I have been clamoring for war all day!"
"Let XXX go to the battlefield first, and the combat effectiveness must be strong."
"People who advocate war have some cerebral palsy."
I've always felt that the "capitulationists" (I'm against labeling, but let me post it this time) have a problem with their positions, but now I suddenly find that their IQ is also problematic. Because if they really want to be "anti-war", "Blood Warsaw" is not a good material, and this film is not an anti-war film, on the contrary, it celebrates the spirit of the Polish people who would rather die than be a slave to the country, and praises the Polish people's uprising, the uprising, which is also a form of anti-aggression war.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right"> 02</h1>
The Warsaw Uprising began on August 1, 1944, and lasted for two months.
Because this uprising disrupted Hitler's battle plans on the Eastern Front, it was brutally suppressed by the Nazi German army, and more than 250,000 Warsaw citizens died.
What the Nazi Germans did in Warsaw was in every way reminiscent of the Nanjing Massacre inflicted by the Japanese invasion of China. The difference is only that the citizens of Warsaw died in the rebellion, while the vast majority of the citizens of Nanjing who were killed by the Japanese army were peaceful citizens. The people of Warsaw wanted to revolt because the suffering of being a slave to the state was worse than death.
In October 1939, after Nazi Germany completely occupied Poland, according to Hitler's orders, it began to systematically eliminate the Polish national elite, and the Gestapo Einsatzg, code-named "Tanengborg", searched everywhere to kill Polish intellectuals, priests, officers, and so on.
Hitler believed that the future Poles under German rule could not have a higher level of education than primary school, mathematics could only learn addition and subtraction within 100, and the highest moral requirements were obedience, hardship, and courtesy to Germans.
If the logic of the people who made and forwarded the video could hold, there was only one conclusion that could be drawn: Wouldn't it be nice to be a slave to the Nazis? Why an uprising? Can the people of Warsaw accept such a "clever" proposal?
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right">03</h1>
Warsaw encountered tucheng, Nanjing encountered tucheng, what should we draw from it? It should never be a general anti-war, but only a just war against an unjust war, and an anti-aggression war to stop the war of aggression!
If the Polish army could effectively defend the country, if the Nationalist government of that year could keep the enemy out of the country in the War of Resistance, would there still be tragedies in Warsaw and Nanjing?
War is cruel, and we don't want war. But if I had to choose between being a slave to the state and participating in an anti-aggression war, I would choose the latter. We want peace, but if the hegemonic countries must impose war on us, we can only fight it to the end, until the final victory!
Now the United States is containing China, not the other way around. It is the United States that is obstructing China's reunification, not China's desire to divide the United States.
Attempts to use the "theory of the cruelty of war" to intimidate the Chinese, to make China surrender without a war, and to let the United States win without a war are despicable and cannot succeed.