According to Taiwan media reports, Taiwan "legislator" Huang Guoshu announced his withdrawal from the Democratic Progressive Party due to the storm of "informants." In this regard, Zhu Lilun, chairman of the Kuomintang, said that it was a "unit of emotional governance in the big era" and not a Kuomintang. According to the latest poll released today by the Times Power Think Tank, 44.1% of the public disagreed with Zhu Lilun's statement, far higher than the 31.5% who agreed.
Polls asked, in response to Huang Guoshu's confession that he had served as a "line of the people" of the Taiwan authorities during the KUOMINTT's authoritarian period, KMT Chairman Zhu Lilun responded that it was a "unit of emotional governance in the great era" and not a KMT. The results show that 9.2% strongly agree, 22.3% agree, 22.5% do not agree, 21.6% strongly disagree, and 24.4% have no explicit opinion. In other words, 31.5 percent agreed and 44.1 percent disagreed.
In addition, the poll asked that as more and more authoritarian period files are made public, it can be expected that more public officials will be exposed as former KMT informants. In your opinion, are these public officials suitable to continue to serve as public opinion representatives and officials of the Taiwan authorities? The results showed that 2.8% thought it was a good fit, 31.8 percent were a good fit, 27.5 percent were not very suitable, 18.2 percent were very unsuitable, and 19.7 percent had no clear opinion. In other words, 34.6% fit and 45.7% didn't fit.