In order to purify the game style, the CBA League added a "three-minute abstention" rule in the 2014-2015 season, which is mainly aimed at the rules that delay the players who have been expelled from the game, resulting in the indefinite stagnation of the game, and the club staff, coaches, and players are dissatisfied with the rules that the referee's decision to punish the long-term dispute with the technical desk and the referee, which seriously affects the normal progress of the game;
The specific implementation is as follows:
1. The referee applies for the technical representative to start the "three-minute abstention" rule,
2. The technical representative notifies the announcer of the record desk,
3. The recording station announced to the audience through the sound equipment of the venue: the ×× team now starts the team's voluntary abstention procedure
4. Press the stopwatch to start the 3-minute chronograph. If the relevant personnel have not left the field at the end of the time, the referee will rule that the team will lose 0-20
5. The CBA League Disciplinary Committee will be dealt with according to the CBA League Disciplinary Punishment Regulations, according to the strike additional suspension and fine
In the last minute of the fourth quarter of the seventh round of the 2021-2022 CBA League game between Guangzhou and Jilin Siberian Tigers, the Jilin Siberian Tigers led the Guangzhou men's basketball team 94:93, Dai Huaibo broke through the jump shot with the ball in the wing, Jiang Yuxing won the rebound in the frontcourt, Cui Jinming had 8.5 seconds left in the game to kill and execute the penalty, at this stage, the referee made a major mistake to award;
1. Dai Huaibo's offensive walking with the ball is illegal
The positions of the three referees at that time, including the bottom line referee and the leading referee's perspective, were not blocked, and it was possible to clearly see Dai Huaibo's steps and violations, and the missed judgment at this critical moment was a serious mistake
2. When Cui Jinming executed the penalty, the referee's gesture has clearly pointed out that the penalty can be freed, and the ball has also been given to Cui Jinming, and more importantly, Cui Jinming's first penalty has been scored, but the referee's strange judgment is invalid;
In the new season, the CBA officially canceled the "time back" rule, even if the referee made a mistake, he could not watch the video to return the game! This time the referee made a major mistake, Guangzhou men's basketball player Zhu Mingzhen against Cui Jinming foul, it is already the sixth foul must leave, but the referee completely forgot about this matter, when Cui Jinming has taken the penalty, the referee remembered that Zhu Mingzhen has fouled the full must leave, Guo Shiqiang knows the rules, immediately made a substitution request, the referee helplessly made a "time back" judgment
The referee of this game, from the major missed judgment at the key moment to the serious error of 8.5 seconds, directly led to the dissatisfaction of the two coaches Guo Shiqiang and Wang Han; the referee finally had to start the "three-minute abstention" rule because of the missed judgment and serious mistakes, resulting in poor control of the field; the referee's missed judgment and mistake made the teams on both sides who worked hard were very frustrated and angry, and the referee was the real culprit that caused this incident! If The referee who violated the law with the ball can make a fair decision, there will not be Cui Jinming's killing and Zhu Mingzhen's sixth foul, and there will be no Guo Shiqiang's guidance to argue on the basis of reason, the referee knows his mistakes, so he did not give Guo Shiqiang a technical foul penalty. However, the 8.5-second game was finally extended by 10 minutes due to the referee's mistake, and what was even more infuriating was the long-term intermittent game, which seriously disrupted the rhythm of the players, resulting in Cui Jinming's rare 2-penalty missing situation, Guo Shiqiang's reasonable and compliant use of rules to challenge the rules of the tactics was successful, and the hard work of the Jilin Siberian Tigers throughout the game was also lost because of the final event!
Chairman Yao Ming: Did your CBA 2.0 "Badger Plan" humiliate the "Badger"?