Text/Spring City flowers and herbs
On October 24, a news item attracted everyone's attention, that is, a self-driving male tourist got out of the car at the Beijing Zoo without authorization, took the initiative to walk towards the white tiger group that was about to erupt, howled in his mouth, and visually measured that the distance from the white tiger was only 3 meters, and there was no protective measure in the middle.
Fortunately, the white tiger did not launch an attack, and the man "escaped from danger", which really made people sweat for him.
Of course, the staff of Beijing Wildlife has called the police, why the man made this dangerous move, the police are investigating.
For an adult man to make such a dangerous move, netizens said that they did not understand.
This is a safari park, and you must be told of the precautions when you enter the park, so why does such a man ignore the rules and dangers and rush into the tiger herd?
After analysis, we found that there are usually 3 situations that contribute to men's behavior:
<h1 class="pgc-h-decimal" data-index="01" > male drunk</h1>
The news said that the self-driving tour, but did not clearly say whether the man was the driver, perhaps a passenger, and enjoyed the game with friends.
Before coming, the man was likely to have been drunk, drunk, and self-restrained, unable to make accurate judgments about the dangers at hand.
"With wine to strengthen his courage", he got out of the car to approach the tiger without authorization, and from the time he approached the tiger, he did not listen to the howl in his mouth, indicating that his state of consciousness was not sober, which was very meaningful to "tease" the tiger.
Therefore, we say that it is very likely that a man who commits such a dangerous act is completely drunk. Zoos should clearly stipulate that drunk people cannot enter the park.
<h1 class="pgc-h-decimal" data-index="02" > men seek stimulation</h1>
Zoo animals are generally artificially fed, and in most cases they are full of alcohol and food, and it is reasonable to say that the aggression is relatively weak.
But after all, it is a wild animal, by nature, and there is no guarantee that there will be no one.
The man may feel that the long-distance view through the car window is like scratching the itch of the boots, so he simply gets out of the car with a fluke mentality to tease the white tiger, and there are still many people with this curiosity.
However, the man forgot that this is not the Tiger Temple in Thailand, where the tiger is not used to getting along with people, and getting off here is like finding his own death.
Is it possible that getting off the bus in a safari park without complying with the rules causes less tragedy?
Just a few years ago, also at the Beijing Wildlife Park, a woman got off the bus because of motion sickness and was attacked by a tiger lurking nearby, and her mother died on the spot to save her, and she was seriously injured by the tiger bite, and finally died of sepsis caused by lung infection caused by the wound.
The woman was only 32 years old and the child was only 3 years old, which was very ignorant.
Even if there is such a precedent, there are always people who ignore the lessons of these blood, such as this man.
<h1 class="pgc-h-decimal" data-index="03" > men bet with people</h1>
Sometimes tragedies arise from absurd practices.
We don't know how many people are sitting in the car, but there is another possibility of the man's bold behavior, that is, to bet with other people in the car.
Sometimes people are so ignorant and bored, always doing something inexplicably stupid.
Perhaps they agreed that if the man dared to get out of the car and approach the tiger, he would get a kind of promise, and he was very impressed with that chip.
We see things that matter with life and death, and everyone behaves differently.
Some people will be indifferent even if they give high chips, but it does not rule out that some people are desperate to take risks, on the one hand, seeking excitement, on the other hand, there is a fluke mentality. This man may be the latter.
No matter what the situation, once the consequences of being attacked by a tiger are unimaginable, then some netizens asked: In case the man is attacked, who is responsible?
<h1 class="pgc-h-decimal" data-index="04" > attacked, who is responsible?</h1>
This problem is easier to explain, if the safari has played a role in informing, such as the standing of the card is obvious, there are personnel to remind, then I think it has nothing to do with the zoo.
If accident insurance is included in the zoo ticket, the insurance company will also make the claim at its discretion.
In fact, the tourists themselves have to bear the main responsibility, the first to get off the bus is the violation of the law first, adults should have a minimum judgment of the danger, do not rely on other organizations or individuals as soon as there is an accident.
Through the cases of blood, we see that going to the zoo to see is a happy thing, and tourists can't do illegal acts on a whim.
Tourists should always maintain a sense of safety, life is priceless, and they cannot dedicate themselves like a cheap cabbage to ignorant wild animals.
I am the fragrance of flowers and plants in Spring City, listening to the wind and rain, picking chrysanthemums on the South Mountain, hoping to send you a relaxing and interesting time