Is this a violation of public outrage in the United States? In the past two days, many countries have spoken out, and the spearhead is all aimed at the United States.
It was Iran that came first, but it was about other countries.
A few days ago, the second meeting of foreign ministers of Afghanistan's neighboring countries was held in Tehran, the capital of Iran. The meeting was chaired by Iran and focused on the current situation in Afghanistan.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abdullahyan said at the meeting on the same day that respecting the territorial and sovereign integrity of Afghanistan and non-interference in the affairs of other countries are the basic principles of Iran's foreign policy; the reasons for Iran's support for Afghan affairs are decided by the Afghans themselves and can establish an inclusive government; and the root cause of the current Afghan problem lies in the strong interference of the United States, so the suffering of the Afghans for 20 years should be borne by the United States in its entirety.
To say that the contradictions and struggles between Iran and the United States have long been frozen for three feet is not a day's cold. As a neighbor of Afghanistan, Iran has witnessed everything the United States has done to Afghanistan for 20 years, including fighting the Taliban, supporting the Afghan puppet government, and forcibly interfering in the internal affairs of Afghanistan. As a result, Afghanistan is devastated and the people are not happy.
This time, Iran publicly condemned the United States, which is also expected.
Next, Malaysia's condemnation of the United States is somewhat unexpected.
On October 28, Malaysian Foreign Minister Saifding said at a news conference that the small military circle formed by the United States, Britain and Australia is extremely unfavorable to peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region.
The attitude of the Malaysian foreign minister is actually the opinion of the country's Prime Minister, Ismail Sabri. Alibu has spoken on several occasions about his views on the TRILATERAL security partnership between the United States, Britain, and Australia. Malaysia, for its part, advocated the continued implementation of the Treaty on the South-East Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone, which should and must be in a state of non-nuclear weapons, with a view to maintaining regional peace and stability.
The city gate caught fire, affecting the pond fish. Malaysia knows the truth of cold lips and teeth.
The United States, Britain, and Australia established a trilateral military alliance and helped Australia build nuclear submarines, the intention of which is precisely to point to the Asian region, which can be described as the ambition of the wolf.
Of course, Malaysia is also doing this out of its own interests. Just imagine, southeast Asian countries that have always advocated peace and opposed the choice of side will not allow the United States, Britain, Australia, and other sinister people to sleep soundly.
If the attitude of Iran and Malaysia towards the United States can only be regarded as a quick tongue, then Russia's attitude towards the United States is definitely heavy fire.
On October 28, the Russian Foreign Ministry fired a series of cannons at the United States.
The first shot was to angrily criticize the United States for forcibly exporting values.
On the 28th, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zakharova said through social media that the first thing the United States should do is to solve the us political and human rights crisis, rather than promoting the so-called American-style "democracy" and "human rights" everywhere.
Immediately, Zakharova listed what the United States had done. For example, in the Navarine incident, a Russian opposition figure, the United States imposed sanctions on Russia on the pretext of violating the human rights of its own citizens.
At the same time, Zakharova also attacked the American shield with the American spear. She used the words of U.S. Secretary of State Blinken and Vice President Harris and other officials to mock the human rights situation in the United States.
She pointed out sharply that the US secretary of state and other senior officials have said that the issue of human rights is the core of the Biden administration's foreign policy, and no matter which country's human rights are violated, the US side cannot stand idly by and watch, but must resolutely oppose and take corresponding measures.
Zakharova then took a sharp turn and listed the political and human rights crises that the United States is experiencing. Citing data from the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, she pointed out that murders in the United States have risen year after year, reaching a new high in nearly a hundred years; since 2019, murders caused by racial conflicts have risen by one-third, of which cases against Asians have increased by 5% and Africans by 50%.
Not only that, Zakharova also ridiculed U.S. diplomacy.
The second shot pointed directly at the diplomatic situation between the United States and Russia.
It is said that there are no weak soldiers under the strong generals. Zakharova is a cadre under President Putin, and her diplomatic style is sharp, tough and humorous.
No, after criticizing the United States for forcibly exporting values, Zakharova mocked the United States again. She said that Russia's issuance of visas to U.S. citizens is as fast and clear as prescribing drugs in pharmacies.
Why? In fact, Zakharova is criticizing the United States. Because, in recent years, the United States has deliberately sabotaged the consular services provided in Russia.
On the same day, Zakharova unceremoniously pointed out that the US side deliberately did not issue visas, deliberately delayed the processing period of documents, and deliberately closed the consulate in Russia...
On the contrary, even so, Russia issues visas to U.S. citizens on time, and as quickly and clearly as in pharmacies (prescribing drugs).
There is no doubt that Zakharova has fired another heavy shot at the dirty diplomacy of the United States. Because the language is a big vernacular that the people can understand, it is both concise and powerful, and it is particularly aggressive.
It seems that the United States has indeed provoked public anger. Not only Iran and Russia have condemned and criticized it, but even Malaysia, which has rarely spoken out, has stood up against it.
After all, the bubble on the soles of the feet is not stepped on by the United States itself. True to the old saying: out of the mix, sooner or later will have to pay back. The United States has oppressed and bullied the people of the world for too long. Now, it is also the turn of all countries to resist us hegemony.