Another "charge".
Another "one-star movement".
On August 17, a documentary suddenly soared to the first place in the Douban hit movie.
Documentary, top hit movie?
Right.
It's called "The Fruit of Life."
Before that, "Fruits of Life" was recognized as a good film.
9.3, the number of ratings exceeded 10w, douban top 250.
Content harmless to humans and animals:
It tells the idyllic life of an elderly Japanese couple.
Overnight, Douban poured in 20,000 ratings, a one-star rate of more than 10%, the score fell from 9.3 to 8.7, and even, in order to avoid disorderly expansion, Douban officially turned off the movie section display function of all user home pages (now restored).
this......
What the hell is going on?
01
The fuse is.
One of the main characters in the film, Shuichi Tsubata, is said to have participated in World War II.
Identity is the Navy.
A stone stirs up a thousand layers of waves.
Netizen anger mainly focuses on several points:
First, the theory of original sin of war criminals.
"The Japanese who fought in World War II should have died in situ."
Second, beautify war with literature and art.
Photographing the happy life of war criminals in their later years, making such a small and fortunate subject is to beautify the war.
Third, hurt the feelings of the nation.
In Douban, the ranking of this documentary (before) was actually before "Twenty-Two".
The protagonist of the former is a war criminal, and the latter is indeed the only comfort women left in China who have not yet waited to apologize.
Why?
Shunto touched the melon, this work is guilty, give this kind of work five stars, certainly not a good person.
If you happen to write a five-star short review for "Fruits of Life" without your knowledge, publish harmless, and have a suitable life understanding for many movies.
Light is hung out as a "target": dog traitor or water army or rational guest.
Serious cases may also be harassed and abused by private messages.
In this way, a movie with a problematic protagonist's identity gradually evolved into a "witch hunt" operation for compatriots.
How did things get out of hand?
Back to the source, the answer is ironic.
Is Shuichi Tsubata a war criminal?
Indeed, Shuichi Tsubata joined the Japanese Navy during World War II as a technical sergeant and a fighter jet designer.
At the end of World War II, MacArthur became commander of the U.S. Allied Forces in Japan.
The famous scene in which he walks out of the plane with a corn cob pipe, and Shuichi Tsubata is the witness of the scene.
But to say that Shuichi Tsubata is a war criminal with bloodied hands is an exaggeration.
According to Wikipedia, Shuichi Tsubata was born in 1925 and was only 12 years old when the Sino-Japanese War broke out in 1937.
In 1945 he was assigned to Atsugi Airfield as a naval engineer.
In August of the same year, Japan surrendered in defeat and the army was disbanded.
△ Wikipedia
In other words, Tsubata had been in the navy for less than eight months, and was in the technical department.
I have never been to the front, and I have never been to China.
As for the fighter jets it participated in designing, whether it has attacked other countries and caused innocent casualties in other countries, from the perspective of the difficulty and cost of technology research and development, it is unlikely.
The development time of fighter jets is often measured in years, including proposing ideas, designing, assembling, and test flights.
China's J-20 fighter is recognized as fast in research and development, and it has been used for nearly 11 years.
In 1945, the end of World War II, whether the declining Japanese army had manpower and material resources to continue to develop fighters was a question mark.
More precisely:
Shuichi Tsubata was a soldier who fought in World War II.
How can I be called a war criminal?
Organizers, instigators, leaders and accomplices of war crimes are called war criminals or war criminals.
Participation in the planning, preparation, initiation or conducting of a war of aggression, or serious crimes such as violations of the laws and customs of war and violations of the principles of humanity, are considered war crimes.
△ Source: Baidu Encyclopedia
Therefore, just because he had been in the army for less than eight months, he was a war criminal, and the bite to death and photograph his later life was in the "beautification war", and then attacked the person who was touched by this work as a "second devil".
But you know.
The horror of "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theory" lies precisely in the fact that it does not need to justify itself.
soon.
Encounters with sticks include, but are not limited to, the following movies:
"Tomb of the Fireflies", the brothers and sisters did not have to die, but sold misery and preached war.
Merry Christmas on the Battlefield, the secret love of officers and prisoners, does not glorify war.
"Porco Rosso", good guys, (the protagonist) and double-click to participate in the war.
......
Miyazaki was speechless when he heard it.
Miyazaki Hayao, a person who urged Japan to "apologize to South Korea and China" on the issue of comfort women, and specially launched the "Hot Wind" magazine to intimidate Prime Minister Abe to revise the Constitution, uphold the Peace Constitution, and oppose the militarization of Japan, can be involved with "preaching war and beautifying war"?
△ Source: Democracy and the Rule of Law Times
Have the scolds seen Porco Rosso?
For me to join fascism, I would rather be a pig
△ "Porco Rosso"
02
Since then.
"One Star Action" is a complete sweep of the film, director, and audience.
And this.
It is not the first time that Douban has been made.
Impressions.
The first large-scale one-star movement encountered by "Douban" just pointed to the "Douban" itself.
Spring Festival 2019.
A group of people stood tall and marched to various app stores on the AppStore and Android in unison, giving the "Douban" platform a star.
Their reasoning is
Douban management is incompetent, free-range water army, hun hun does not have a good piece of meat.
They caught a bug in the Douban scoring system
When a user modifies their own review, the previous number of likes is retained.
Let's take an analogy
If you give a work 5 stars, get more than 2W "likes", be on the front row of the comment area, and get more exposure in disguise.
At this time, if you suddenly turn your face and change the evaluation to one star, the "like" still exists, and the position is still in the front row;
It's just that the people who agreed with you before were "betrayed" in this way.
Is this a bug on the product?
Of course.
This is the fuse of the "four stars to one star".
Why did he change the evaluation.
- Don't ask, you must have collected money.
Gradually, there was more and more evidence of "collecting money".
Change the price tag of the review, from 1000 to 10000.
- Frankly, seeing 10,000 Sir laughed.
Ring after ring, becoming a conspiracy theory that is linked from end to end.
Forced Douban to issue a clarification:
The so-called "high praise was bought into a bad review" is purely a rumor.
After data investigation, only 4 users of the top 500 hot reviews of "The Wandering Earth" modified their scores across scores.
subsequently.
The trigger of this incident, the user concerned, also posted clarification.
In two days, I personally witnessed things from "Douban someone four-star to one star" → "Douban many four-star five-star to one star" → "Douban film critics collect money to change points".
Now the infamy of the whole Douban back, in fact, from the beginning to the end, I just did it alone, and was guided step by step by various unfounded screenshot speculations into this way, which really made me cry and laugh.
I don't know what to say, and as a "initiator", I don't seem to be qualified to say anything, but I just have a real understanding of something that I once saw only in theory and historical stories.
Sir is afraid to mark that you have also skipped, and then draw the point
"Douban someone four-star to one star" → "Douban many four-star five-star to one star" → "Douban film critics collect money to change points"... Being led step by step by various unfounded screenshot speculations into this way really makes me cry and laugh.
In the final analysis, what is the difference between these one-star Douban and those who give "Fruits of Life" a star.
Two groups of "one-star parties", the same magical reality.
Together, they played out a major wave of chinese networks today
At first, it was false evidence;
Then, there are the slogans of the crowd;
After that, if you don't make a sound, you default, and if you make a sound, you will wash yourself white.
In the end, the truth is ignored, and the truth is a chicken feather.
Farce?
The list of disturbed people is getting longer and longer.
From "The Wandering Earth" receiving money, to Liu Yifei saying at the premiere of "Mulan" that "I am very proud as an Asian", to today's "Fruits of Life" beautifying the war.
An extreme, extreme mood is growing wantonly, oppressing, and eliminating any mild expression and discussion.
In "One Second".
The protagonist, Zhang Jiusheng, catches Liu's girlfriend who stole the film in the noodle shop and holds it down without letting go.
In order to save herself, Liu's daughter cried out a sentence:
"You're a bad guy!"
Zhang Jiusheng was in place with a stirring spirit, and the flames of Zhang Fang's dancing claws disappeared instantly.
Quickly lean down and cover her mouth.
Zhang Jiusheng was not afraid of being discovered.
What I am afraid of is the meaning behind those three words.
Liu Girl didn't understand, but she knew that these three words were useful.
By shouting with your tongue, you can quickly eliminate dissidents.
Sir certainly agrees
Everyone has the right to give any movie a star.
but.
Is there a kind of "one star", which is a hammer and hammer that deprives others of the right to give other stars.
This kind of "one-star" is often beyond the scope of reviews.
Its purpose is to:
Kill that movie.
As an old douban.
Sir found.
Today's Douban is no longer a movie (art) lover, recording movies and looking for good places.
The interpretation of forced binding, the pickpocketing of clues, the conviction of Zhang Guanli Dai, the pulling of one after the other...
When other platforms are not uncommon means began to invade Douban.
Douban is becoming more and more like a court of judgment.
Bad guys, two devils, and even the middle of the line are all guilty.
To evaluate a film, we must first understand the life of the director, the life of the protagonist, the motivation for creation, and determine that all aspects are flawless.
There can only be one situation in which such an extreme scenario can develop downwards:
Pseudo-moral involution.
Remove the bad molecules of small particles from the good molecules, and divide the better molecules and the best molecules from the good molecules.
Why do you praise?
Why don't you criticize?
Why aren't you criticizing loudly enough?
This kind of mutual harm and mutual harm hollowing out is the most basic mutual trust between people.
No one will be satisfied.
Nor will there be one to gain tranquility.
03
It's not Douban's fault.
In the midst of a storm.
No one expects it to be a place to whisper behind closed doors.
Perhaps to put it mildly:
It's wrong in still trying to watch the movie.
What is a movie?
Utilitarian perspective:
Movies are eggless.
To be honest, the movie thing is dispensable, the whole industry has disappeared, and it has no impact on people's production and life.
Somehow.
He's right.
But Sir still couldn't resist asking.
What about painting, about music, and the hobbies that a few people are obsessed with, and the majority are indifferent to.
Play bird fishing.
Play chess bungee.
What "useful" influence they exert on production.
The score is useful, the house is useful, the money is useful, but you find that no, the lives of those who cling to "useful" are often enslaved by "useful things".
996,007, how many struggles, how many sacrifices, how many camps must be made to fill the black hole of pragmatism.
And "useless" is a betrayal of "the only".
You love music, I love movies, and we may all be losers in the mundane sense, but it doesn't prevent us from living our own colors.
These "useless" greatness.
It is precisely to get rid of the tool attributes and restore the original texture of a normal person.
Just like human nature.
Inherently rich, ambiguous, and impossible to be eternally defined.
It's a pity.
Throughout the discussion of movies in Douban in the past decade, it has increasingly become a variety of "black and white" and "right and wrong" struggles and sides.
Recently Sir can't understand, but an example of what was shocked is that in "Midsummer Future", Wu Lei did not love Zhang Zifeng, but kissed her, which was defined as slag.
When does our understanding of people, human nature, narrow down to such a field.
If Wu Lei kisses Zhang Zifeng is scum, then please ask
How do you understand Ma Xiaojun's violence against Milan in "Sunny Days", and when Milan in turn pressed on him, Ma Xiaojun ran away in his pants.
How to understand "Bitter Moon" Oscar met a woman on the bus, Mimi, he haunted her, chased her, after having her, and then gave her up, and even personally pushed her to other men.
How to understand in "Love", the middle-class couple who have loved for a lifetime, one day, the old lady had a stroke, after taking care of it day after day, this day, the old man who had neither cheated nor was in financial difficulty finally smothered the old lady with a pillow.
Sir cites the above shocking examples not to prove anything, to defend anything.
Sir just wanted to say:
When the expression of the film is forced to take a step back.
Then, the freedom of human nature is also forced to take a step back.
Finally, back to the question at the beginning:
Is giving "Fruits of Life" five stars a bad element?
Sir can understand the patriotic fervor of those "one-star" people.
In fact, as a Chinese, love for the country does not need to be aroused.
In the words of Jiang Wen: "As long as a person still knows who he is and has a certain respect for his personality, he will love his motherland." ”
The question is, how to love?
Sir wanted to mention a different patriotic movie.
Ip Man.
I believe that every Chinese will be beaten ten by Ip Man in the movie, and the scene of beating the Japanese is boiling with blood.
But look back.
Is Ip Man's fury due to lofty national feelings?
No.
His rage was that he could not stand it, a compatriot, a man so insulted, oppressed, and torn apart by militarism.
This is where Ip Man really moves.
Rather than portraying a national hero, director Ip Wai Shin wants to create an ordinary person.
He stepped forward, not because his fists were hard enough, but only as a minimal empathy for one person to another.
This is the empathy of the weak and the weak.
Compassion between humility and humility.
And for the heat wave that swept everything, Ye Weixin was vigilant.
Remember the "traitor" in the film, Li Zhao, played by Lin Jiadong?
As a common man, of course, he was greedy for life and afraid of death.
He worked as a translator for the Japanese.
On the surface, he was helping the Japanese, but privately, again and again, he couldn't help but help Chinese.
What is his real end?
"According to the publisher of 'Ip Man,' in the original version of 'Ip Man,' Li Zhao, a Japanese translator played by Lin Jiadong, bravely beat to death a fierce Japanese adjutant in order to save Ip Man, but unfortunately he was beaten to death by a crowd of agitated and unreasonable people."
That's enough.
Stop there.
Crazy slogans are certainly more pervasive than meticulous logic.
Extreme emotions are certainly more contagious than complex realities.
But because "destroying" is so easy, resisting temptation, guarding the bottom line, and slowly moving up step by step, it is worthy of the applause of victory.
Playing a star, Douban chaos, works are untrustworthy, expression is silent, community alienation, humanity collapses............
Where did it all start?
Sir just wants to remind:
When you hit the keyboard.
Remember.
You are a person.
The picture in this article comes from the network
Editorial Assistant: Super rich mother-in-law