Author: Scale APP user
I have always had great respect for the elite, but some analysts are incomprehensible.
In ancient times, analysts were called strategists and military masters, and if they were private consultants, they were called masters, and those who came up with bad ideas were called dog-headed military masters.
Whether ancient or modern, an analyst is a job and a conspiracy with people. People who come from an analyst background want to do big things, and they basically have no drama.
Now many analysts in A shares where they are conspiring with people, it is simply a black mouth, and they are still cheeky all day long. Shame, self-proclaimed economist.
There are roughly three kinds of analysts, one is to look at macro, one is to engage in strategy, and the other is to micro stocks.
Stock analysts are the easiest to punch in the face, and the rise and fall is in an instant, so they often worry about being called black. To avoid a black-mouthed reputation, they have a lightning-safe approach: value investing. What is value investing? Buy it for three or five years like a dead pig, rise you come out and say, a few years ago Lao Tzu said that it is long-term optimistic.
Stock analysts this kind of faceless we see more, engaged in strategy that is even more faceless, they often give you the whole of their own may not understand the so-called strategy, and then wait for the bragging, you see, we look at photovoltaics, we look at new energy vehicles, which type of stock rise, are the reasons for their good strategy.
Do you still want a face?
The picture comes from the Internet, invaded and deleted
The most disgraceful thing is a group of macro analysts who claim to be economists. The vast majority of this type of person is a liar, they don't even know how to define an economist, they just stare at the title of economist all day long, do you want to face it? As for how economists define it, compare the standards themselves.
Tell me why they don't have faces? For example, in the RRR cut a few days ago, before the stock market did not open, the so-called economists jumped out and said that the RRR cut was good for the economy, good for the stock market, especially for the increase in bank profits. Anyway, a strong blow, all kinds of conceivable benefits will greet upwards.
If it goes up, they'll say, you see, Lao Tzu is right, right?
If it falls, these goods will not let people punch in the face, they will say, what is the reduction of the standard? It is to loosen the currency, why to be loose, indicating that the economy is showing signs of sluggishness, the competent departments are wise and heroic, and when you are sick, you must take medicine, do you say that taking medicine is a good thing? Today's trend just releases the risks behind the RRR cut.
Interest rate cuts are the same as RRR cuts, before the opening, they will pounce on them like hot, saying why raise interest rates, because the fundamentals of the economy are very strong, and the interest rate hikes are that the leaders have great confidence in the economy.
Will the rate hike rise? Maybe, but a lot of times it will fall, but they are already in a hurry to eat hot, and what if the stock market falls and hits their faces? They will teach leeks in a very unashamed tone of economists, raising interest rates to bring about monetary tightening, which is basic common sense, and leaders should make the economy sustainable and healthy, optimistic about the future, which means that the stock market will rise.
Isn't that angry? People have two skins on their mouths, and no matter what, they are right. How to verify this analytical statement that? On the scale APP, the value and demining inside, directly related to the stock, right or wrong at a glance, directly let the stock rise and fall to speak.
The article comes from scale APP user Li Delin. Two treasurers
The article represents only the views of the author that any loss or gain resulting from the investment thereunder is independent of the scale app.