Recently, bad reviewers heard that in a circle of traditional competitive sports, there are not few people who open plug-ins, but they are quietly becoming more, and even many professional players are wading through muddy waters.
Is it difficult to open and hang and there is also a phenomenon of human-to-human transmission?
And it is the circle that the bad reviewer wants to introduce today - chess. (Don't be fooled by the Chinese chess memes that flatter the chess atmosphere.) ）
According to foreign media reports, with the global pandemic of new crown pneumonia, many competitions, including chess, have had to be held online at home.
In fact, at the beginning, fans were still quite optimistic, because the logic was very simple: everyone was isolated at home, they had more time to play chess online, and many passers-by would try interesting chess because they were bored at home.
It's going to be fire, it's going to be fire, our storm chess is going to be on fire!
But who could have imagined that the fire was a fire, but it was only a "fire" that caused the "fire" to burn the body.
Take Chess.com, the world's largest online chess website, for example, which has added 12 million new users this year because of the coronavirus, which is a full double that of last year.
But at the same time, the number of people who opened and cheated was threefold, and more than 17,000 cheating accounts were banned every month...
The last time I heard the news of a scientist, it was in the e-sports circle, an Indian CSGO player changed the file name of the plug-in program to "word .exe", and then blatantly opened it in the offline game.
Although there were some bad reviews of jun that year " learning materials. Avi" style, but in the end, the same destination, the Indian gun god was still caught. Word .exe thus becomes the stem of the CSGO circle.
Over the years, with the development of various anti-plug-in technologies and the standardization of e-sports events, there is a saying that similar e-sports competitions seem to have not been heard for a long time.
The news of this opening on the traditional chess project is believed to be unheard of by many people.
I don't know if it's hard for players who have ruined the competitive experience by the openers, but the bad reviewers can guess that the employees of the regulatory department must be as uncomfortable as eating flies.
Kenneth, an old professor at the chess regulatory body, said that he would like to see the chess regulatory authorities. Reagan complained: My vacation was ruined.
The British "Guardian" even said that chess has ushered in the "era of computer doping".
Of course, in chess, perspective, self-aiming, blood locking and other hanging iron must not be needed, and their plug-in principle is also very simple, that is, directly use the computer to calculate the move, according to the computer's prompts to play chess IS OK.
Although the artificial intelligence AlphaGo beat humans on Go, it seems that this was a few years ago. But in fact, in chess, IN 1997, IBM's "Deep Blue" had already defeated the then chess champion Kasparov.
With the development of computer computing power, more than twenty years later, an ordinary personal computer can easily hang the vast majority of human beings.
After machines defeat humans, there have been no less cheating incidents in chess circles. The most famous one is the chess master Iger Roses was banned from cheating on his phone in the toilet.
And what is interesting is that he has been banned for six years since last year, and this year he actually disguised himself and changed into a vest to continue to compete, but he was still reported by his kind peers.
After most chess games have recently been forced to move online, the practice of hanging has become even more rampant.
At this year's American Chess League, World No. 260 Petroson defeated World No. 2 Karuana.
Although it may seem like a unique game of weak victory over strong, there are so many Istanbul nights in this world. Soon, the organizers noticed that Petrose's eyes were off the screen from time to time during the game, and there seemed to be another screen giving him hints...
They thought he was hanging, and Petroson and the team champion were immediately stripped away and banned for life.
In addition, there are also many chessboard scientists in the youth competition. The head of the Chess Challenge at the British School of Texas said at least 100 of the 2,000 online players at their event had opened the hang.
Of course, this is not an empty mouth without filth to clean up people.
Because the organizers were surprised to find that there were many young people in the youth group whose chess strength was enough to open up with the world chess king Carlson... It is really a "hero" from ancient times!
Finally, after discovering that the top three would all be the hangers, the organizers cancelled the game overnight.
But just when the bad reviewer felt that the phenomenon of cheating in chess was only limited to the small circle of chess, the overwhelming amount of information on the Internet hit me in the face.
Because, the bad reviewer found that in Chinese chess, and even in The Game of Go, there are many scientists walking everywhere.
Chess grandmaster Tao Hanming directly bombarded: chess circle software cheating has become a common practice.
When Wang Tianyi, the champion of the World Chess Championship, plays chess and talks in the live broadcast room, he is often hung by various folk masters, and Wang Tianyi also bluntly says that it is worse than playing a game.
Because the Go circle has just been conquered by AlphaGo, they use the more professional black language "walking the dog" to describe the behavior of using AI to cheat.
It is also suspected that someone slipped the dog offline, and at the Lishui Qingyun Cup National Amateur Go Open Tournament the year before, there was an amateur player who defeated Hu Yuqing 8 dan.
When the chess player was playing, the mobile phone happened to be placed on the chest, and the mobile phone camera was always pointed at the chessboard. In the end, the amateur player chose to retire under public opinion, and whether he walked his dog offline has become a mystery.
In response to the increasing number of cheaters, South Korea directly let them go to jail this year, and strengthened the security of offline competitions.
Of course, it is still difficult to effectively supervise the behavior of walking dogs in online competitions.
Among other things, there are bad reviewers who are known as the saints of small chess in the street, and they have encountered open hangers when playing chess on the Internet.
The other party was very rampant, and at the beginning he admitted that he had opened the hanging and wanted me to have a horse. And threatened that whether it was "with horses" or "without horses", it was not a matter of winning me.
In the end it won the game. But I was convinced, after all, it gave way to a horse.
After watching so many chess opening and hanging events, the bad reviewers feel that the most pitiful thing is not the normal players who are abused by cheaters, but the poor cheaters.
Blinded by victory and fame, they may no longer experience the joy of fair play.
But on the other hand, because a random plug-in can hang professional players, it has made many people confused about the intellectual projects represented by chess.
Now that artificial intelligence has defeated humans, what is the point of various board games?
After being defeated by AlphaGo, Lee Sedol once said that he could no longer find the meaning of playing chess. Ke Jie also revealed that when playing chess with artificial intelligence, she can feel despair.
But the bad reviewer is more optimistic about this, because the machine is a machine after all, and people are people after all.
The development of photographic technology does not destroy the art of painting, but allows various genres to blossom; cars and trains run faster than all humans, and this does not negate the value of track and field athletes constantly pushing human limits.
The same is true of intellectual games represented by chess, whose meaning is not something that machines can give or deprive.
Even if one day, ai write articles that are worse than bad reviews, it's not a big deal, because they can never replace any one-of-a-kind person.
In fact, with the development of chess AI, there are now many chess competitions that belong to AI, such as the World Artificial Intelligence Go Competition, the Top Chess Engine Competition and so on.
On the official website of TCEC (Top Chess Engine Competition), you can also see the AI's live broadcast.
After all, machines are better than machines, people are more people, and we have nothing to gossip about.
But if everyone is the same as the opener, not even the machine and the person, what is the difference between us and the machine?