Wen | Ling Fox Bo Guang
On August 14, Yu Rongguang's director version of "Tianlong Eight Parts" was launched, and the answer was that it was no accident that word of mouth really "pounced on the street".
If I want to evaluate it personally, it must be far inferior to the Huang Rihua version in 1997 and the Hu Jun version in 2003. But it is still stronger than Zhong Hanliang's version, here will not analyze the shortcomings of this version, interested can watch Bo Guangqun's last manuscript.
Yu Rongguang's version of "Tianlong Babu" is indeed bad, but the actors selected in it may be recognized as bad. For example, Taiwanese actor Yang Youning played Qiao Feng without any heroic and chivalrous temperament, Duan Yu's actor is even more disasteratic, the actor of the virtual bamboo is still OK, and the other actors are too old.
So the question is, as far as the actors are concerned, which version of Huang Rihua's version and Hu Jun's version of "Tianlong Babu" is more classic?
Now the audience because of the "emotional filter" relationship, if the analysis of a classic version of the advantage is not to analyze the shortcomings of the TV series, but to refute everyone's feelings and childhood memories, in the end will only quarrel and then quarrel out of a reason.
Here we will start from the original book and talk about where it is best to see the two versions of the actor from the original book.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="4" > Huang Rihua is indecisive, Hu Jun's version of banditry is too heavy? Two versions of the actor who is higher</h1>
I personally feel that the choice of actors in these two dramas, the actors for the shaping of the role is not divided, are each restored part of the original work, mainly depends on which version the audience prefers, there are many factors that like it.
For example, the absolute male protagonist Qiao Feng, Huang Rihua's version of the folk is extremely popular, in fact, the two versions are each shaping part of the original work' advantages; Huang Rihua shaped a part of the "chivalrous", And Hu Jun shaped a part of the "wolf nature".
At this time, many people may say that this is not the best version of Huang Rihua's version of Qiao Feng, qiao Feng is jin Yong's first hero.
Although the words are true, anyone who has seen the original book knows it. The character of Qiao Feng is very tragic, the source of his tragedy is the entanglement of Song Min's growing up and education and Khitan national identity, and the projection of this character's behavior is both the chivalrous righteousness (benevolence) of the gang leader of the Great Song Dynasty, and the heroism and ferocity (wolf nature) brought about by the blood of the Khitan people.
Everyone thinks carefully about the scene of the wolf's head on the chest when the father and son recognize each other, and it is not called a hint.
In the original work, three scenes were used to tell the murderous side of Qiao Feng, the first story is that qiao Feng refused to see a doctor for his father when he was a child, and his mother Lost Money to blame him, and Qiao Feng was angry and secretly climbed into the dog hole and stabbed the doctor to death. The original Arjun's reaction was: Although the doctor is hateful, his sin does not lead to death, and this child is so cruel, just like the Khitans.
The second scene is that Juxian Zhuang Qiao Feng is bitterly persecuted, and finally it is the group of heroes who force Qiao Feng to fully show his wolf side. In the original work, Qiao Feng was a complete massacre of the heroes, and even had "no time to distinguish the faces of the opponents, red eyes, and kill everyone." Elder Xi even died under his sword. " paragraph
In the original work, Qiao Feng gave up resistance and also grabbed the Shaolin Xuanku Master, thinking that the martial arts on his body came from Shaolin. The entanglement of his own Hu Han identity, in the end, a little bit of a thousand thoughts of choosing to die, Huang Rihua version after Qiao Feng killed Elder Xi by mistake, accompanied by the tragic bgm, Qiao Feng was greatly shocked and could not bear it.
At this time, someone behind him sneaked in, and he had to attack Aju QiaoFeng before he let go of his hand and began to kill.
Huang Rihua's version of Qiao Feng always has a feeling of being forced to kill his friends by mistake, and finally he is helpless to choose to fight back. This version further highlights the benevolent side of Qiao Feng, and even a little indecisive, and many fans of the original work describe Huang Rihua's version as "middle-aged Guo Jing", which is not unreasonable.
The bloody aspect of the Hu Jun's version of the Juxian Zhuang War of brutal killings is indeed more restored to the original work. Hu Jun's version is to enter the door to drink the wine of the broken friend, and when there is a personal toast, Qiao Feng does not agree to slap people away. Then directly start fighting special effects against the bombardment. When someone was going to sneak up on Arjun yelling "good no face" and then taking up arms and killing the four sides.
Although this version is not as bloody as the British and American dramas, it is more restorive to the scenes of the original work. But the hu jun version of the play is too fast-paced and ends quickly. In general, Hu Jun's version of the whole scene lacks a sense of layering in the emotional progression. Huang Rihua's version of Qiao Feng Renyi was too much to kill the red eye at all, which obviously did not conform to the description of the bloody man in the original work.
Since the Hu Jun version of the cruel wolf side of the original Qiao Feng is better, then the chivalrous side of the original Qiao Feng is better than the Huang Rihua version, in addition to the parts listed above, many other scenes Huang Rihua version is more heroic.
Chen Haomin's Duan Yu is more agile and dashing; Lin Zhiying's version of Duan Yu is more elegant and bookish.
As for the two versions of Wang Yuyan, many people may not have seen the original work, that is, Liu Yifei and Li Ruotong each had two versions of the two versions and the original work.
Li Ruotong's version of Wang Yuyan is more restored, because in the original work, Wang Yuyan is a bit stupid and wooden because of love; the original Xiaolongnü is cold but has the agility of a girl, Li Ruotong is too cold and virtuous; Liu Yifei Xiaolongnü has a fairy spirit and agility, and her Wang Yuyan has a little more girlish playfulness.
Virtual bamboo I think Gao Hu is more like a restoration of the original work, one is because the virtual bamboo in the original work is very ugly, the High Tiger at that time is obviously more ugly than the Fan Shao Emperor at that time, the second is that the original virtual bamboo is really stupid, Fan Shao Huang version is too cute and cute ——
In addition, many characters are also two versions with their own advantages, like the two versions of Duan Zhengchun are good, the two versions of Aju are not divided into Xuanxuan, Liu Jinling's Aju is beautiful and beautiful, and Aju's Liu Tao is gentle and virtuous.
In the two versions of Ah Zi, Chen Hao's appearance is obviously higher, the interpretation of the role is almost the same, Liu Zhengcui is cunning and poisonous, and Chen Hao is fierce and persistent.
XiuQing version of Murong Fu and Zhang Guoqiang version of Murong Fu and so on, You Tanzhi I personally feel that Ma Yuke is more humble, And Brother Feifan is a little worse because of his body shape, but the gap is not big.
Duan Zhengchun's lovers feel similar in my eyes (Shirley's Kang Min is stronger). Ye Erniang, Yunzhong Crane and other family generals are almost the same, the South China Sea Crocodile God Huang Rihua version is better, and the Hu Jun version is too funny. These are all characters that I personally feel are interpreted by both sides as part of the original book, or not far apart.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="215" > hu jun version of the beautiful woman like a cloud, Huang Rihua version of tvb supporting roles really familiar</h1> face
The above said that the two versions of the role are about the same, let's talk about the two versions of the actor over the role of the other version of the actor, no matter from which aspect it is obvious that the other version is better.
1, Hu Jun's version of these actors are obviously better, can be called the top of each version
First of all, it must be Duan Yanqing, the head of the late action actor Ji Chunhua's "Four Evil Men". In the original work, Duan Yanqing was disfigured, bald, crippled, and could speak belly, and his appearance and appearance were extremely vicious, as long as he had seen the original work and then looked at the Hong Kong version of Duan Yanqing, when Duan Yanqing looked at Duan Zhengchun, he broke his mouth and scolded: Duan Zhengchun, you dog thieves——
spectator:?????
Secondly, there is another important role in the play, Shen Junyi's version of Ding Chunqiu, everyone just needs to remember this. The Runaway Sect of the original "Tianlong Eight Parts" is each "Yan Dog". In the original work, Ding Chunqiu was burly, with flowing silver hair, often over the shoulders and long whiskers, a leisure fan, and large sleeves fluttering like immortals.
Neither version of the actor has a childlike face, but the Hong Kong version is too funny and too clown; Shen Junyi is really handsome and personable. You will believe that the wuyazi of the original "Yan Dog" will choose him as an apprentice, and Li Qiushui will get along with him.
Finally, the level of some beautiful female characters in Hu Jun's version is higher, because this drama gathers many well-known beautiful actresses from both sides of the strait and three places, and some actors are indeed more recognizable than Huang Rihua's version.
For example, Shu Chang version of Tianshan Tong Yao is obviously better, the original Tong Yao is an eight or nine-year-old girl, Shu Chang although the shape is quite what, but Shu Chang looks higher, the body shape is also thinner, Chen Anying version you will not think that she is called Tong Yao right.
Xie Yuxin's version of Li Qiushui is the same, and you will have a stunning feeling when the actor appears. Sue's magnetic version of Li Qiushui does not have the feeling of being beautiful in the original book, although there are wounds on his face. And the appearance itself is not enough, you will not feel that the "Yan Dog" Wuyazi will be with her.
2, Huang Rihua's version of these actors are obviously better than Hu Jun's version
The first is the Shirley version of Kang Min, I believe that this does not need to be said, Zhong Liti's version is too sexy and solid, and at that time, Zhong Liti was not beautiful enough, there was no snake and scorpion beauty feeling.
The second is Li Guolin's version of Jiu Mo Zhi, in the original work, Jiu Mo Zhi Bao was solemn and very dignified, and doing things like Ding Chunqiu was another matter. Although the Bayin version of Hatsumomo is a minority himself, the actors dress up and act a bit shady.
Then there is Ho Mei Tin's version of Zhong Ling, which is caused by the small "actor's inner volume" in the Hong Kong market. Many beautiful actresses who later became famous have played many small roles in the early stages. These beauties are too good-looking, and their acting skills are good, and the audience's impression is naturally very profound, which is similar to Lu Songxian's version of "Smiling Proud of the Jianghu" Tang Ning's version of Qu Feiyan.
When it comes to Zhang Jizhong's version of Zhong Ling and Qu Feiyan, you can't even think of the name, right?
Finally, some Hong Kong TVBs often appear to play villains, the audience is very familiar with this face, and the actors who are deeply impressed, and the mainland actors are relatively unfamiliar and not so impressed. For example, Quan Guanqing, Xuan Ci and other supporting roles and so on.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="220" > end</h1>
Finally, "Tianlong Babu" as one of Jin Yong's peak martial arts novels, since its birth, the film and television dramas adapted can not be said to be countless, but the number is indeed quite large. For Chinese audiences, it may still be the Huang Rihua version, and the Hu Jun version is the most classic.
After all, the earlier Version of Liang Jiaren and the Hui Tianci Version of Taiwan have not had a strong memory of the audience. The later Version of Yu Zheng, and the popular Version of Yu Rongguang, the former is the product of the "traffic economy" in the new era, the production is shoddily made, the actors are selected in a mess, the story plot is changed to a mess, and there is almost no advantage.
Yu Rongguang's version seems to have stepped out of the "traffic economy", and the field framing and art are worthy of recognition. However, the choice of actors left over from the "traffic economy", and then the slow motion design of the production mode of domestic costume dramas in recent years, the unsatisfactory adaptation of the original work and so on, still exist.
Over the years, Huang Rihua version, Hu Jun version of the two versions of the fans prefer which version of the quarrel.
In fact, if you think about it, the audience of the earlier version does not remember it deeply. Now the audience should not be unanimous, because the later versions are too bad, let the classic version stay in the heart!