The Tokyo Olympic Games have entered the countdown, and foreign media have also specially compiled a set of data to count the athletes who participated in the top nine athletes in the annual income ranking of the Olympic Games, and as a result, the world's number one tennis superstar Djokovic only ranked fourth, behind the Japanese tennis woman Naomi Osaka two positions, which made people sigh.
According to data released by Forbes, Durant, who ranked first, has an annual income of $75 million, followed by 23-year-old Japanese mixed race Naomi Osaka with $60 million, Lillard ranked third with 40.5 million, Djokovic had an annual income of $34.5 million, just a little more than half of Naomi Osaka, and McAuroy, Buke, Kei Nishikori, Middleton and Holy day ranked 5 to 9th respectively.
From this list, basketball and tennis are big money suckers, there are 5 and 3 people on the list, golf is the only other sport on the list, but the author is very uneven for Djokovic this time, no matter how unpleasant Djokovic's style and character are, his achievements and levels are obvious to all, as the highest voice of the best tennis player in history, Djokovic's income is only a little more than Kei Nishikori, less than Half of Naomi Osaka, it is indeed very unfair, it can be politely said, 3 Osaka Naomi + The sum of the achievements of the 5 Nishikori Kei is not as good as Thato, so why do they have more than Deyo?
However, compared with Djokovic, Federer Nadal's income is naturally much better. According to reports, Federer's annual income last year reached $90 million, mainly from sponsors, and Nadal's income this year also exceeded 40 million, ranking third among tennis players, and the income of the two of them is directly proportional to their achievements and influence, so the author wants to be uneven for Djokovic: Why is Deyo's achievement so high, but the income can only be equal to a quasi-second-rate player, Kei Nishikori?