Since the Sino-US dispute was put on the surface by the United States, the United States has actively built a circle of encirclement against China; at least from the immediate point of view, whether it is provoking on the eastern coast of our country or supporting India's attack on China as a behind-the-scenes force, the ambition of the United States to contain China at the same time in the east and west has been very clear.
Friends who pay attention to current affairs know that in recent times, China's eastern maritime frontier and western land frontier are facing provocations from external forces. In the eastern sea frontier, the US military frequently sent warships through the Taiwan Strait and made verbal promises to Japan to instigate the Japanese side to continue to attack China on the issue of the Diaoyu Dao; on the western land frontier, India once again took the initiative to provoke China after lying dormant for half a year, not only sending troops to provoke our border officers and men, but also deploying advanced equipment such as MiG-29 fighters and M777 artillery on the Sino-Indian border. Even the United States and India have joined forces to sabotage major projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. The U.S. government has denounced CPEC as a "debt trap" for China against Pakistan, while Indian intelligence agencies are directly suspected of instigating multiple terrorist attacks against CPEC. All in all, for a time, China's southeast-southwest frontier fell into a state of instability almost at the same time. Obviously, it is not a coincidence that the United States and India are causing trouble for our country on the Chinese border at the same time, but that the US ruling clique is using the "two-front war theory against China" to deal with China.
The so-called "theory of two-front operations against China" is a strategy of military provocation against China that has been very popular in the US political circles for more than a decade, which believes that the United States can take advantage of its advantages with more allies and at the same time launch military provocations to China from the west and east, so that the PLA will run east and west, and it will be difficult to concentrate all its national defense forces in one direction, thus consolidating the superior position of the US military.
Previously, although the theory was very popular in the US political arena, it was not implemented on a large scale. But recently, the United States has suffered a major crisis in the economic and trade field, from the president's secretary of state to the secretary of commerce, to the trade representative, and American officials large and small have had to turn to China for help. However, although the United States hopes to get China's help, it is unwilling to compromise with China, so many negotiations between the two sides have failed to achieve the desired results. Against this backdrop, the U.S. ruling clique is likely to be vicious and bold, in a vain attempt to get China to accede to some of the U.S. demands in the economic and trade fields through strong military pressure. Therefore, the "two-front combat strategy against China" has been able to be carried out.
We know that two-front combat is a big taboo for soldiers, and there are countless countries that have lost because of two-front operations in history. Therefore, seeing the situation that our country is now in, many people are very worried.
In fact, such anxiety is not necessary, and it is not difficult for our country to break the situation. The trap set by the United States to trap China in a two-front operation seems ingenious, but in fact it is full of loopholes.
The first way for our country to break the situation is the military deployment that is currently being adopted: "the western region is mainly based on the defense policy, and the eastern region is mainly based on the forward policy." On the one hand, India's military, scientific, technological, and economic levels are completely at the same level as China, and the threat to China is very limited. On the other hand, China occupies the favorable strategic terrain of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in the Sino-Indian confrontation. At the same time, India lacks the strength and determination to expand the conflict with China. Therefore, the idea that the United States wants India to contain China's large amount of military strength is simply impossible to realize, and this is precisely the key to India's several provocations, and China has always maintained a strong enough strategic determination to effectively fight back against India's provocative behavior on the basis of being reasonable and well-founded and showing national prestige.
In fact, in the process of successive Indian provocations, the Indian side has always created a public opinion momentum, while the Chinese side has appeared to be light and breezy. China's calm performance is not only due to the psychological superiority of fighting against India, but also from the performance of self-confidence in military equipment and personnel quality! Therefore, we can see that every time India shouts very loudly, but when the sword is really sharpened, the Indian side will find a step for itself!
Unlike the western region, which is mainly aimed at stabilizing India, in the face of the provocations of the US side in the eastern sea frontier, our army bravely showed its sword, repeatedly dispatched ships and planes to expel the US side in a domineering manner, and normalized the implementation of cruises around Taiwan and sailed around Japan with the Russian Navy. The reason why the eastern and western fronts have different treatment methods is that it further demonstrates China's flexible approach to specific issues, specific analysis, and specific treatment. Different from India, in the face of US hegemonism, we must not only show our fists, but also dare to punch and be good at punching.
From another point of view, as long as we can defeat the US military in the eastern sea frontier, and at the same time control the key strategic points on the western border, do a good job of patrol prevention, and avoid the Indian army encroaching on the territory, the South Asian powers with false tiger power will inevitably restrain their behavior!
In addition, the second way for our country to break the situation is to strengthen international cooperation. Although the United States wants to drag our country into the dilemma of "two-front operation," why is the United States not fighting on two or even multiple fronts? In East Asia, the United States actively engaged in military confrontation with China; in Europe, the United States once instigated Ukraine and Russia to meet with each other; in the Middle East, although the US military hoped to shrink, it has been slow due to resistance at home and abroad, and Israel has frequently provoked trouble and obstructed the United States from returning to the Iranian nuclear agreement. At the same time, Turkey, which has long cooperated with the United States, has also begun to "have two hearts", and even threatened to expel the ambassadors of ten Western countries, including the United States, at the end of last week. It can be said that the United States is now in an unfavorable situation of multi-front operations, and even faces a worse situation than China. After all Chinese people can be united in the face of the threat of the United States, and the United States is scattered and full of ghosts in the face of the threat of the United States. Therefore, as long as we strengthen cooperation with other countries that resist hegemonism, we can make the United States lose sight of one or the other worldwide.
Unlike the United States, China has a group of real friends around it. Taking the current western front as an example, China's courage to implement the strategy of focusing on stability on the western front is largely related to the close connection between us and Pakistan Railway. Recently, Pakistan Railroad has made a naming and criticism of the sabotage of the United States and India.
At the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Summit held by Karachi Business School on the 23rd, Khalid Mansour, special assistant to the Prime Minister of Pakistan and head of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Affairs Bureau, said that the United States and India are working together to try to undermine the further development of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, and such an attempt will not succeed. In this regard, foreign media commented that the United States has always opposed the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor project, but this is the first time That Islamabad has responded bluntly.
In fact, from Pakistan's attitude, it is not difficult to see that China's Belt and Road Policy has sent Economic Development to Pakistan and the happiness of the people, but the United States only wants to extract benefits, in this case Pakistan warns the United States to be justified! In response to the border friction instigated by the United States to provoke India on the western front of China, Pakistan is actually one of the keys to our breakthrough. Previously, Aerospace Jun has repeatedly stressed that the contradictions between India and Pakistan should be properly resolved by the two countries, but as a good partner of China, China will not allow India to carry out acts of aggression and suppression against Pakistan. At the instigation of the United States, India is constantly provoking the border between China and Pakistan, and if the Indian side crosses the red line, it is not ruled out that the Chinese side will join hands with Pakistan Railway!
All in all, the so-called "two-front operational theory against China" is an erroneous theory promulgated by some US politicians based on the Cold War mentality and mechanically copying the historical experience of World War II that is fundamentally unsuitable for the current situation and cannot play a practical role in China. If the United States really hopes that China can help the United States solve the problem, it should negotiate with China sincerely and on an equal footing, and come up with conditions that satisfy China, rather than using military threats to force China to comply. On the wrong path, the faster you run, the faster you fail, and the United States is now in that state.