laitimes

Is Macbeth's evil sustained by desire?

author:Flowing water

After re-reading Macbeth a few days later, there were a few questions: Where does desire come from? Is it something out of nothing, or is it seedlings that help it grow? And then desire torments people? When is the shortcut a sin? But there are shortcuts not to go, life is limited? There is no such thing as no desire and no demand, and who has no desire, even if it is to drink a cup of happy fat water? But what is sin? Unscrupulous, or reckless?

The witch is just vain, and if you replace these with Macbeth's burning desires, the torment of the heart. In fact, it is also possible. The ghost arrangement in the drama is like playing a dream. Our village party secretary can have a dream, so that everyone can start donating money to build a small palace temple. So if you replace all the witches and ghosts in it with psychological illusions, it feels like modern realism. Modern people, who has not been tormented out of a little disease?

Macbeth certainly didn't want to be king on the first day. Just like Wu Someone didn't want to choose a concubine on the first day. Fatty liver is also not hypertrophied on the first day. That's a little bit of accumulation. But what if there is a sudden glory? For example, if you burst into a big name, you can suddenly point out the feeling of the country. Do you feel stupid? I'm afraid not. Macbeth suddenly received a higher knighthood, and then began to feel that the mountain was not so high, and that the pot should be his. But he wasn't so determined either. So his community of interests, that is, his wife pushed him. You can't always want it, and you can't dare it. So why don't you dare? But do you just think that there is reincarnation in the Heavenly Path? Out of the mix always have to pay back? Three feet above the head with a god? Is it that when all the so-called rules of civilization are set aside, the animals in the jungle are only looking at who can eat whom?

Reading martial arts novels as a child is like Jin Yong's first book, which is a book of swords and enmity. If you want to be civil and martial, you have a vendetta. And I'm afraid I don't understand why the so-called Tai Shi Gong also wrote a special assassin biography, and it is inexplicably wonderful, this is not a killer. Of course, after looking at a little, it is not all professional killers, and there are rewards. Unfortunately, some seem to value form and result. But in any case, it seems that there is always a rule under civilization, or jungle rule, that underpins the animal world at the bottom. And the bottom line of defending one's own territory or one's own ethnic territory is that if people do not offend me, I will not offend, and if people offend me, I will fight back. That is to be able to fight back. Therefore, the grass should be cut to remove the roots. "The Monarch" is not less instructive. Unfortunately, Macbeth did not remove the roots. The two princes ran away, especially the chosen crown prince to England. And eventually fought back, framed the Scottish world.

Anyone who crosses the red line shakes, but someone always steps over. It feels like stepping on a stepping stone and the stepping stone behind it will also appear. Heaven forbid. And then what? Macbeth and his wife partnered to kill King Duncan. Marrying two guards looks silly. Then, he was transferred to Duncan's two sons, which also seemed inexplicable. Obviously, they are not steadfast either.

At the banquet, he suddenly saw banke's ghost panicking, losing his square inch, and began to leak the heavenly opportunity. Lady Macbeth tried her best to cover it up, but it was a big blow. In the end, I couldn't help but go crazy. Hands are always bloody and can't be washed off. Macbeth began to hysterically go to the witches to give him confidence.

Shakespeare even arranged for the leaders of the witches to arrange the reversal. This may be cheap to drive the plot. It may also be to show the rules we mentioned earlier, which maintain the animal fighting system. The witches summoned three souls to give three reasons to strengthen Macbeth's confidence, and three facts that were broken. Dramatically ingenious, it can only be magical in the real world, but it cannot be said to be unreal. Jean captured McDuff and ran away, which is easy to understand; a man without a woman can defeat Macbeth and end up having a caesarean section; saying that if the Bornan woods moved, he would lose, and the result was that each of them cut down a branch to disguise it, and marched forward in the fog. However, once they thought they were dependent, they all suddenly fell, and Macbeth collapsed. The ending is still happy and vengeful. Evil does not end well.

It seems that evil has evil retribution? So why do we still feel unfair? For example, it is now said that many entrepreneurial gods have begun to falsify their academic qualifications, which seems to be much more understated than a drop of blood that can see the vast sea of people. So, do you want to find a job and decorate it differently? It's probably going to be big step by step. When desire is fulfilled, it becomes bigger. Coupled with the shortness of life, do you have to catch up late if you don't take it early? And after passing through this village, don't you worry about this shop, won't you hide the sky and cross the sea? If everyone obeys Macbeth well, may Macbeth not be able to do it well? Is there a heart so powerful? There should be. It's just that how many people don't want fame and fortune? Macbeth could, and someone was also dressed in yellow robes that day. You are afraid of the prophesied Bancor, but there will always be other Banco. Moreover, the pipe is behind us. There is always a balance to be made in the long course of history. If your opposite home has been eradicated, there will also be people who will take the place of Skywalker in name. Of course, which day is this day, and who says?

So whether we can have a big enough heart to bear it, the success of the red line is famous. And then, what about good reincarnation in the life cycle? Hard. We can rationalize our behavior and gain peace of mind. Ask all murderers, especially the more they kill, they probably won't feel like they're doing something wrong. Macbeth was restless because he couldn't really feel at ease. One is that inner torment, but reality does not allow it. The king's son really called.

Put it in a small range, such as domestic violence, such as school bullying. That's a self-consistent rationalization. But just like the Qing Dynasty could not resist britain's ships and cannons. It's always going to break. It's like the dark deep forest law in "The Three-Body Problem".

Well, maybe there's a god up there really. Or maybe it's just a good wish.

Read on