We often say that we are too lucky to have witnessed federer, Nadal and Djokovic working together to create more and more records. ATP and WTA are completely different states, WTA is full of flowers, the appearance of Grand Slam women's singles champions is increasing, and the REASON ATP has always been stable is because Fernard has maintained the status quo together - almost all the championships of heavyweight competitions are included in their pockets. For this reason, the Big Three is a majestic word, what do you think of many players who have repeatedly lost to the Big Three? Perhaps we have overlooked this question.
Post-80s players rarely have the strength to win in front of the Big Three, but Murray, Del Potro, Cilic, Wawrinka, etc. these post-80s have successfully taken the Grand Slam men's singles championship from the Big Three! Although the number of Grand Slam titles they have is far less than that of the Big Three, we have to objectively evaluate these post-80s players who have been crowned Grand Slam champions, they are indeed very remarkable players.
And the post-90s players, it's much more miserable. Yanovic, Raonic, Dimitrov, Thiem, Busta, Edmund, Zheng Heng, Cechnato, Tsitsipas, Puui, Beretini, Medvedev, Zverev and other outstanding post-90s have reached the quarter-finals and final four of the Grand Slam, but they are all blocked by the big three on the road to the championship. Among them, only Thiem, Raonic, Medvedev and Zverev have reached the final of the Grand Slam, they have defeated one of the Big Three in a Grand Slam, but because there is another big man and can't taste the taste of the championship, so in front of the Big Three, although they have had the opportunity to get closer to the championship, they can't stop the Big Three from winning the championship.
Only last year's SITUATION IN THE U.S. Open was special, Federer withdrew from the competition early, Nadal announced his withdrawal from the competition, and only Djokovic played in the U.S. Open, in good shape, but accidentally hit the ball in the face of the line and was forced to disqualify. Therefore, last year's FINAL OF THE US Open was free of the threat of giants. It was only then that Thiem and Zverev had the opportunity to create the history of the first post-90s men's tennis player to play against a Grand Slam final. In the end, Tim won the prize and became the first ATP Grand Slam men's singles champion after the 90s! But then there is controversy – a Grand Slam champion who didn't beat the Giants isn't a real champion. This statement is both absurd and reasonable. A Grand Slam champion is the highest level of tennis title, without a doubt. And the Grand Slam championship won by defeating the giants is indeed a gold bar. Watching Murray and Wawrinka each take three Grand Slam titles from the Big Three, we all know they're very good players.
Post-90s players have the same ambition. Thiem, who has reached the finals of a Grand Slam in the past three times and lost to Nadal and Djokovic, has said he is particularly eager to win a Grand Slam title from the Giants, even though he has won the US Open. Zverev also said he was trying to find an opportunity to beat the Big Three to win a Grand Slam title. Medvedev, who has reached the Grand Slam final twice, all of them defeated Nadal and Djokovic, knows that the giants are difficult to shake, and he said that he will try to beat the giants in the next game. Tsitsipas is also eager to beat the Giants to win the title.
So as long as the giants are there, if the post-90s want to win the Grand Slam championship, they must defeat the giants to have a chance to win the Grand Slam championship, otherwise it is meaningless to often shout slogans to win the Grand Slam championship.
It is often reported that many players welcome Fernard's active presence in the tennis world and want to play against them, and it is their dream to beat the giants.
But!
The former world number three, Argentina's Nalbandian, who won the 2005 ATP Finals, tells you: "A lot of players are waiting for the Big Three to retire!" ”
Yes, the existence of the Big Three is to crush the dreams of many players, the post-90s generation has not yet won the Grand Slam title is going to be old, and Thiem was 27 years old when he won the US Open. And the WTA has won the championship after 00, and there have been a large number of Grand Slam champions after 90!
It's hard to think about. It is true that some players after the 90s are looking forward to playing with the Big Three; some players do not want to fight with the Big Three, just waiting for the Big Three to retire, and it is even more true! Who wouldn't want to win the championship? The Big Three entered the 30-year-old stage, not only was not dragged down by the 30-year-old circle, but also became more powerful, and their number of Grand Slam champions rose dramatically!
Nalbandian continued: "But from the time I was still playing, they are still giants. So young people, don't wait any longer! Grab the racket and beat them! ”
Instead of waiting, it is better to find a way to improve the batting technique, strengthen physical strength, improve psychological endurance, pick up the racket, and beat the big three like a death squad, which can only be this way! (Source: Tennis House Author: Stray Rabbit)