Da S posted a handwritten letter and confessed to his mother that he was unfilial, and Da S's lawyer said that he had been deceived miserably

When Marriage Becomes an Entertainment Scene: The Truth and Reflection Behind the Big S Divorce Turmoil

The divorce turmoil between Big S and Wang Xiaofei is like a soap opera with ups and downs, full of accusations, reversals and speculations, and continues to occupy the public eye. From the initial "peaceful breakup", to today's lawyer's intervention, the exposure of handwritten letters, and then to the shocking prediction of netizens about Big S's "suicide", this divorce farce is far from as simple as it seems.

Big S's absence from the birthday of his mother and current husband Gu Junye triggered a strong backlash from public opinion. The lawyer's accusation of "being deceived miserably" pushed Big S to the forefront of public opinion. In the handwritten letter, Da S revealed his heart to his mother, revealing deep self-blame and helplessness between the lines. Far from quelling doubts, the letter sparked more speculation. Netizens turned into "Sherlock Holmes", trying to piece together the truth of the incident from the clues.

Some people believe that Big S is acting in a bitter drama trying to win Wang Xiaofei's sympathy in order to get more financial support. After all, compared with Wang Xiaofei, who is wealthy, her current husband Gu Junye's economic strength is obviously much inferior. Some people also pointed the finger at Big S's lawyer, believing that the lawyer deliberately complicated the incident for his own interests, leading to the escalation of the situation.

Behind the hustle and bustle of public opinion, should we give the parties more understanding and space? As a wife and mother, Da S is under unimaginable pressure. The breakdown of her marriage and the raising of her children have become a heavy burden on her shoulders. The lawyer's intervention may not be out of malice, but to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the client.

This divorce turmoil also reflects society's harsh judgment of women. Every choice of Big S, whether it is remarriage or absence from family gatherings, will be magnified and interpreted and become a sharp weapon to attack her. People seem to forget that she is first and foremost an independent individual who has the right to choose her own path in life.

Instead of indulging in gossip and speculation, we should reflect on the underlying question behind the incident: how to balance self and family in a marriage relationship? In the face of public pressure, how should women protect their rights and interests? How to build a more rational and inclusive public opinion environment?

This divorce turmoil may gradually fade out of the public eye over time. But the reflections it provokes deserve to be taken seriously by each of us. Only when we learn to look at problems with a more rational and tolerant mindset can we avoid similar tragedies from happening again.