With children, it is inconvenient to go out, but there is also a new sustenance. It's just that on ordinary days, even if you become a parent, you can't help but want to go out to play, and when you go out, you will bring your little baby, and men are the same.
He brought his two older children, with a stroller in his hand, and the children played in the play area, while the children's mother and girlfriend were shopping in the mall. It can be seen that this father is really caring, taking care of the children himself and letting his mother go shopping.
When it was time for the child to feed, the child's father sat down cross-legged without restraint, held the baby in his arms, and fed the baby with a bottle. The little one may be really hungry and has a lot to eat.
The child's father stared at him and made him amused. At this time, a security guard from the mall came over and told the man: You affect the image of the mall like this. The man was very puzzled, he was sitting here temporarily, feeding the child, how could it affect the image of the mall.
Bao Dad didn't understand, and asked the other party to call the leader, who knows if the leader came or felt that he would affect the image, and asked the man to leave and go upstairs to feed. The man was very angry, his family was here, why did he go upstairs.
After the dispute, the child's mother came over, so she asked her to record and record this scene.
It is normal for babies to be hungry, and it is normal to feed them with a bottle, and put them away when they are full for the child, how does it affect the image, and everyone is also puzzled.
If you really feel that sitting cross-legged affects it, just remind it directly, why drive others away.
After this incident was exposed, a reporter contacted the other party, and the other party's attitude softened, explaining that the original intention was to want the child's father to take the child to the mother and baby room, and nothing else. He also explained that he may not pay attention to the way he spoke at the time, but he will pay attention to the way he handled it later. But they do not deny the impact on the image of the mall.
This explanation is very far-fetched in the eyes of most people, breastfeeding will choose the mother and baby room, the mother and baby room is mostly women, if you really go, it is estimated that this baby father will be installed as a hooligan, the infamy of a pervert.
Besides, just bottle feeding is nothing at all. It's like if you walk in a mall, buy a cup of milk tea, are too thirsty, take a sip on the road, and then you will be accused of affecting your image?
Even if the man did leave, what happened to the two older children who were playing, and was the mall responsible? Do you blame the adults for their poor supervision?
I have to say that this way of dealing with it is really inappropriate or even insincere. But if you look it the other way, you won't do it. Never threaten others with what little power you have, otherwise you will only bear the burden in the end.
Subsequently, the mall was picked up, and countless people left messages in the comment area of the account, and the state was also in a state of decline
In the author's opinion, even if the staff involved understands a little, they will not regret saying such cold words. The image of the shopping mall is sometimes humanistic care, if the leader apologizes at that time, and then takes a stool and gently reminds, the image is there all of a sudden.
The situation is the opposite, if it weren't for the lack of stools, maybe I wouldn't be sitting on the floor.
The comments were one-sided in favor of the man, the mall was only vague, and netizens kept questioning.
Loading...
The best solution may be to apologize, if the apology may be able to recover the image, the brand image of not apologizing is estimated to be affected, and the waiters and leaders are afraid that the work will not be guaranteed and regret not being at the beginning.