First of all, I would like to emphasize that abolishing the status of English as a major subject and not learning English are two different concepts. After the abolition of the English subject, those who think that English is important and those who want to learn it, he will also find a way to learn it.
People who think that English is not important, who can't use it themselves, don't have to learn it, don't waste a lot of time.
For most people, English is unimportant and will not be used for the rest of their lives.
Therefore, removing English from the main subject will not affect others' learning of English, and it will also reduce the burden on most people.
Now a large number of our students have to study English for more than ten years and may not be able to use it for the rest of their lives, which I think is ridiculous!
There are even a lot of places where you don't use English, but the English level is the threshold, which is ridiculous!
For a long time, it was necessary to pass CET-4 to graduate from university, what is the reason? We are Chinese, our mother tongue is Chinese, why does English level become the graduation standard? Fortunately, this criterion has now been abolished.
However, English is still a compulsory subject when taking the postgraduate examination, and some majors do not use English at all.
Today's children start learning English in kindergarten until they graduate from university, and then go out to work 99% of them don't need it.
In the past ten years, learning English has occupied a lot of children's time, and English has caused a huge waste of life resources for children.
Suffice it to say, children spend much more time learning English than they do about history, geography and language.
This also leads to the fact that many children do not understand history, do not know everything, and even forget history.
If you don't know the terrain, there are many children who can't even read a map, so it shouldn't be a necessary means of survival in wartime or peacetime!
Some people say that if you don't learn English, foreigners will come, and we can't understand what they say.
Shouldn't he speak Chinese when he comes? Don't know how to follow the local customs? Do you go abroad and you speak Chinese to others?
It is enough for those who need it to learn, and there is no need for the whole people to learn. If learning English is just for exams, it won't make any sense.
Most people can't use English in their lives, so it's better to use the time to learn English, such as martial arts, to strengthen the body, and improve the physical fitness of the whole people, such as the theoretical study of weapons and equipment.
For most people, English is just a waste of time and can affect the course of your life.
How many students are good in other subjects, but their English is not too good to be admitted to the school of their choice. As a result, he could not stand on the platform he should stand on, causing him to miss the opportunity he should have, and burying the talent in this way.
Therefore, I strongly recommend that the status of English as a major subject be abolished and replaced with an elective subject. Those in need, whether it is a major subject or not, he will go to learn. If you don't need it, you don't have to waste a lot of time on English, so why not?