This article is only published in Toutiao, and the articles on other platforms are counterfeit for your better reading experience, click "Follow", and I will update you with entertainment information every day.
Today, there is a topic that has caused a lot of waves. Yang Yi's apprentice, Brother Tiger and Brother Leopard, vaguely told everyone that Xie Lei's statement about Aunt Xiao Wu was true! What's going on here?
What's the story behind it? Right and wrong, true and false, let's explore together, listen to the voices of all parties together, and in the exchange and thinking, we may be able to find the truth of the matter. Let's embark on a journey full of unknowns and explorations.
Hou Yaohua put forward the idea of cleaning up the portal in the live broadcast, and this idea instantly caused widespread controversy in the cross talk world. You must know that in the field of cross talk, which pays attention to inheritance and teacher rules, cleaning up the portal is not a trivial matter. It is not only about the reputation and future of the individual, but also about the inheritance and image of the entire sect.
And when this controversy has not subsided, Yang Yi publicly stood up to dissuade Hou Yaohua. However, things developed in a more complicated direction, and Yang Yi accidentally leaked Hou Yaohua's personal privacy in the process of dissuading. This move undoubtedly added fuel to the fire and made the already tense situation even more difficult to manage.
The dispute between Hou Yaohua and Yang Yi is still going on here, and Xie Lei has joined the melee over there. Xie Lei continuously hit back at Yang Yi through video, and his rhetoric was fierce, and even involved Yang Yi's wife, five aunts and their private lives. This involvement of family members has undoubtedly made the nature of the controversy even worse.
Yang Yi's wife, Meng Zhen, naturally would not sit idly by, she decided to defend her rights in accordance with the law and resolutely defend the dignity and rights and interests of herself and her family. In this process, Meng Zhen mentioned the so-called little fifth aunt and the child, which made this controversy more and more confusing.
Just when everyone was still shocked and confused by these things, Yang Yi's two apprentices, Brother Tiger and Brother Leopard, suddenly spoke out. Their remarks seemed to hint at the authenticity of the matter of Aunt Xiaowu, which undoubtedly added another fire to this already chaotic controversy.
The cross talk industry has always been regarded as a treasure of traditional culture, and the teacher-student relationship and sect disputes between artists have also occurred from time to time. But it's rare to see such a complex controversy involving so many sensitive topics and so many personalities like this one.
We can't help but wonder who is right and who is wrong in this seemingly endless controversy. Is Hou Yaohua's idea of cleaning up the portal too radical, or is Yang Yi's public dissuasion method inappropriate? Did Xie Lei's riposte go too far, and what does the voice of Brother Tiger and Brother Leopard mean? More importantly, what impact will this controversy have on the development of the cross talk industry?
Some people believe that such a controversy will expose the internal contradictions in the cross talk industry, affect the image and reputation of the entire industry, and hinder the inheritance and development of cross talk art.
Indeed, when a series of controversies caused by Hou Yaohua's live broadcast continued to escalate and spread, the contradictions that might have been hidden in the shadows were unreservedly placed in front of the public. This kind of undisguised exposure allows the outside world to see that there is not a harmonious atmosphere within the cross talk world, but there are many complex and acute problems.
The public's impression of the cross talk industry is often humorous, humorous, harmonious and united. However, the emergence of these controversies shattered this beautiful imagination. What people see is artists arguing fiercely, attacking each other, and even getting their families and private lives involved. This chaotic situation will undoubtedly give viewers a negative view of the cross talk world, believing that the industry is full of strife and discord.
Once the image and reputation of the industry are damaged, it will directly affect the audience's acceptance and love for cross talk works. When the audience's overall impression of the cross talk industry deteriorates, they may reduce their attention and support for cross talk performances, which is extremely detrimental to the dissemination and promotion of cross talk art.
Moreover, from the perspective of inheritance and development, such a controversy will bring confusion and confusion to the younger generation of cross talk practitioners. They may be suspicious of the rules of the industry, the relationship between teachers and disciples, and do not know how to follow the tradition and how to develop their own artistic path in this complex environment.
But some people believe that only through such a fierce collision can some hidden problems surface, so as to prompt the cross talk industry to self-reflect and rectify, and promote the reform and progress of the industry.
This view is not unreasonable. For a long time, there may be some problems in the cross talk industry that have been covered up or ignored. For example, the unreasonableness of the teacher inheritance system, the uneven distribution of interests within the industry, the vague definition of the artist's code of conduct, and so on.
These problems may be obscured by superficial prosperity in normal times, but when a controversy of this magnitude emerges like the one caused by Hou Yaohua's live broadcast, it is like throwing a boulder into a calm lake, stirring up a thousand waves, so that those problems hidden in the depths can no longer be hidden.
Through such a fierce collision, the cross talk industry can have the opportunity to reflect on itself comprehensively and deeply. Artists can think about whether their words and deeds are in line with the ethics and artistic pursuits of the industry, teachers and students can re-examine whether the inheritance system needs to be improved and perfected, and the entire industry can also think about how to establish more fair rules and order.
Rectification is a key step in solving the problem. For those behaviors that violate industry norms and damage the image of the industry, there must be clear penalties and corrective measures. At the same time, it is necessary to strengthen the education and training of artists and improve their professional quality and moral level.
Ultimately, these rethinking and rectification efforts are expected to drive reform and progress in the industry. For example, establish a more scientific and reasonable talent training mechanism, encourage innovative and diversified forms of artistic expression, so that cross talk art can better adapt to the development of the times and the needs of the audience.
Regarding the series of controversies caused by Hou Yaohua's live broadcast, we can't simply generalize whether it is good or bad. The key lies in how the cross talk community views and deals with these issues. If you can learn from it and actively improve yourself, then this turmoil may become a turning point in the development of the cross talk industry; But if the contradictions are allowed to intensify and are not resolved, the future of cross talk art will be worrying.
In any case, the chain controversy caused by Hou Yaohua's live broadcast has plunged the cross talk industry into unprecedented chaos and predicament. We can only wait and see what the future direction holds. But I hope that the artists in the cross talk industry can deal with these issues with a more rational and mature attitude, so that the art of cross talk can continue to flourish, instead of gradually losing its way in endless controversies.