"You killed my dog, you are not responsible for my dog, and you ...... my dog's life" Recently, a video of a woman in green holding a brick and angrily smashing a car attracted the attention of netizens.
Ms. Zhu, the publisher of the video, said in an interview with a reporter from Huashang Daily Gale News that the video was shot by her husband, and it was also his old public car at that time. More than a month after the incident, the woman who smashed the car has not been dealt with by the police.
Online video——
Woman smashed the car with bricks in the basement, "You killed my dog, and I was given my dog back"
Photographer: The dog was unleashed and was injured by a car, and the owner smashed the car to vent his anger
According to the video, it is suspected that in the basement of a small community, a vehicle is parked at the driving lane, and it is suspected that there is a broken car glass on one side. In the video, the woman in green smashed the glass of the car many times. The photographer said, "At the moment, the dog owner came and smashed my car. ”
The woman in green turned around and pointed in the direction of the camera and shouted, "You killed my dog, you are not responsible for my dog, and I will return my dog's life......" and then continued to smash the front windshield of the car, and the front windshield was visibly damaged.
The woman in green yells in the direction of the camera
The photographer asked, "Do you know what you're doing?" The woman did not respond and continued to smash the glass on the right side of the car and smashed the glass of the car. Later, when leaving the scene, he was suspected of smashing the photographer and left the scene under the camera.
The woman smashed the glass on the right side of the vehicle
The person who filmed the video said that the dog ran under the car without a leash, and after being frightened, he heard that he had bitten the dog owner, and the dog owner then smashed the car and injured people. Now, nearly two months later, the woman has not been disposed of in accordance with the law.
This incident sparked heated discussions among netizens, and many netizens believed that the reaction of the woman in green was too extreme, the basement could not walk the dog, and the dog owner was not leashed, so the dog was injured and the dog owner should bear some responsibility, and the two parties should be a civil dispute. If the dog owner smashes the car, it is intentional damage to other people's property.
The person concerned told -
The woman talked about compensation to no avail, snatched the car keys and then turned back and smashed the car
The police opened a case for intentional damage to property
On July 18, a reporter from Huashang Daily Gale News contacted Ms. Zhu, the publisher of the video, who said that the person who shot the video was her husband, Mr. Yang, who is from Shandong and has lived in Wuhan, Hubei Province for nearly 10 years. The scene in the video occurred at around 12 noon on June 7, when Mr. Yang was driving in the basement lane of the Agile Garden Community, and encountered a vehicle occupying part of the lane, so he slowly detoured from the reverse lane, "At that time, there were three people walking their dogs, two of which were not leashed. "The three of them seem to be a family."
Ms. Zhu recounted that while Mr. Yang was slowly detouring from the reverse lane, a woman suddenly patted her car and signaled to stop, saying that her dog was crushed. After parking, the other party took out the dog under the car, and heard that he was bitten by the stressed dog, "After the dog was rescued, a man took the dog away, and the woman said that the car hit and injured her dog, and asked for compensation." Mr. Yang believed that the dog should not have been walked in the basement, and the dog owner was not on a leash, so he was definitely not fully responsible, so he wanted to call the police and the police intervened, but the other party did not agree, snatched the car keys and left.
Ms. Zhu said that Mr. Yang chose to call the police because the car keys were robbed. Within a few minutes, the woman returned to the scene and smashed the car with bricks, and a scene in the video occurred. About 2 hours after the incident, the police arrived at the scene to deal with it.
On the same day, the Miaoshan Police Station of the Jiangxia Branch of the Wuhan Public Security Bureau issued the "Notice of Administrative Case Filing", which showed that Mr. Yang was deliberately damaged property, and our unit has filed a case.
Surveillance Video –
When the vehicle was turning slowly, one dog was suspected of being in the driver's blind spot
The argument lasted about 6 minutes, and the woman drove away in the car for about 3 minutes, turning back and smashing the car
According to the surveillance video provided by Ms. Zhu, the specific time of the incident was around 12:20 p.m. on June 7, a car was parked at the traffic lane, and the woman was standing next to the car and was suspected of waiting for someone.
About 2 minutes later, a man and an elderly man met with a woman, who was suspected to be about to open the door.
At 12:20:50, Mr. Yang's car appeared in the surveillance footage, the car next to the woman occupied the traffic lane, and Mr. Yang's car turned slowly. A reporter from Huashang Daily Gale News noticed that during the surveillance, a white dog was at the load-bearing column of the basement, which was suspected to be located in the blind spot of Mr. Yang's car. When the woman saw the car turning, she did not seem to have alerted Mr. Yang to her dog.
At 12:21:05, Mr. Yang stopped after turning slowly, and the woman quickly stepped forward to squat down to check the bottom of the car, and the man and the old man on the side stepped forward to check. Subsequently, the woman suspected of having a verbal altercation with Mr. Yang.
At 22 minutes and 35 seconds, Mr. Yang got out of the car and communicated with the woman. At 25 minutes and 46 seconds, the man suspected of picking up the injured dog and putting it in the back seat of the car next to him.
At 26 minutes and 57 seconds, the woman drove the car away from the scene. Mr. Yang was suspected to have called the police and the vehicle was parked in the wrong lane.
At 28 minutes and 29 seconds, the woman reappeared in the surveillance field of vision, walked to Mr. Yang's car, suspected of holding a hard object in her hand, smashed the car window, etc., and opened the car door to throw out the items in the car. Mr. Yang was filming and collecting evidence.
At 30 minutes and 20 seconds, the woman ran away from the scene.
Fruitless treatment –
The maintenance cost was more than 10,000 yuan, and the injury was identified as a minor injury
Nearly 1 month after the case was filed, the dog owner has not been punished
Ms. Zhu said that after the case was filed on June 8, they drove the car to the 4S store to make a price for damage, as advised by the police.
According to the "quotation", the model "Wuling Hongguang"; The list of maintenance parts has 17 items, including the front windshield assembly, the right front door glass assembly, the right rear door welding assembly, the right front door welding assembly, etc., the estimated material cost is 9230 yuan, and the estimated working hours are 2400 yuan, totaling 11630 yuan.
In addition, according to Mr. Yang's injury appraisal report, he was injured at the end of his left upper arm due to the stone injury, and the near elbow was slightly bruised, swollen, tender, and slightly restricted in his movements. Diagnosis of "upper arm injury". According to the appraisal opinion, the degree of Mr. Yang's personal injuries was minor.
Ms. Zhu said, "The police said that we needed to pay this part of the cost in advance, and said that we would approve the maintenance invoice, so we paid the maintenance fee." "Around June 10, the police had an ambiguous attitude, saying that the other party's dog was nothing serious, but the woman was bitten by the dog, and both parties were responsible, so it was not a criminal case; And the other party could not take administrative detention on him due to hospitalization, pregnancy and other reasons, "Later, I asked the police again how to deal with it, and told the woman that she went to Shanghai, but she couldn't find ......"
Police response –
The dog's owner was in Shanghai and refused to cooperate with the forced summons
The criminal standard will be determined based on the price appraisal
On the afternoon of July 18, the police of Miaoshan Police Station responded to Ms. Zhu that there was no progress in the case at present, and the police notified the woman who smashed the car to cooperate, but the other party refused to cooperate with the police to handle the case, and did not answer the phone, and the notice and compulsory summons did not come, "We have already put her on the Internet, and if she returns to Wuhan, we will deal with it as soon as possible." "She's not in Wuhan at the moment, and she's in Shanghai. Out of Wuhan, we can't do anything about the forced summons. ”
"This matter is currently a public security case, and we are going to do an object appraisal, and if it turns out to be a criminal purchase, we will take the method of pursuing the fugitive online." The police handling the case said that if it was not criminal enough, the police could only take charge, and when he returned to Wuhan, the police would arrest him as soon as possible.
On the merits. The police said that Mr. Yang did not fight back during the whole process, but even if he snatched the car keys, etc., in this case, the police could only choose one of them if they found that they had violated the law, and they could choose a heavy punishment, "We will handle your case according to the damage to other people's property; If it is considered to be intentional assault and the injury does not amount to a criminal offense, the dog owner only needs to pay a fine. ”
About price appraisal. The police said that they had made an appointment with the price appraisal department before, but because the other party had temporary arrangements, they could not be appraised, and they are still making an appointment with the other party for appraisal. The specific determination needs to be based on the objective situation shown in the surveillance video, "which places are smashed in the surveillance, which places can be identified." ”
In this regard, Ms. Zhu said that after more than 1 month, her husband was delayed due to being smashed and damaged vehicles, "I hope the police will give the results as soon as possible and give us justice." ”
On July 18, a reporter from Huashang Daily Gale News contacted the Miaoshan Police Station of the Jiangxia Branch of the Public Security Bureau about this matter, and the staff said that they were paying attention to the matter and that the specific results of the case would be fed back to the parties.
Huashang Daily Gale News reporter Zhang Pengkang Intern Yang Wenyu Editor Dong Lin
(If you have any news, please call the news hotline of Huashang Daily at 029-8888 0000)