#头条首发大赛#
According to the global network, United States White House recently announced that United States, Canada and Finland will form an "icebreaker alliance". A senior United States government official revealed that the United States and its allies want to have 70 to 90 icebreakers in the next decade.
To be honest, the United States is also trying to be blind, and look at the strength and purpose of each country to know the real situation and future development
The first is United States, United States itself has two icebreakers, old and broken, hovering on the edge of scrapping for a long time, maybe one day it will not be able to drive back, the formation of an icebreaker alliance is of little significance to United States, Alaska is close to the North Pole, but trade does not pass through the Arctic, and Canada is a neighboring country, isn't it fragrant to take the railway? There is no need for the United States to go to Europe to go to the edge of the Arctic, it is completely thankless.
Therefore, this move by the United States is likely to circle money, fool Congress into paying money, and then fill the pockets of various links and officials. Of course, United States is embarrassed to show its intentions too obviously, and pulling the alliance together is the best choice
The second is Russia, Russia has 40 icebreakers, very powerful, after all, they are attached to the North Pole, the cold is really cold, without icebreakers their own domestic transportation will be disturbed, especially in summer, sea transport saves a lot of money for their domestic transportation, icebreakers for Russia, it is necessary and affordable, a little more is normal
Finally, China, we now have two, the Snow Dragon 1 and the Snow Dragon 2. The main work of these two icebreakers is to conduct scientific research in the Arctic, regardless of shipping in the shipping lanes. Antagonism? It's completely non-existent
To be honest, we don't need to open up the Arctic shipping lane, opening the Arctic shipping route is Russia's business, Russia has done it, we just take the road to pass by, the smooth thing, through the Arctic shipping lane, our Dalian to Europe is closer, more convenient and safer, plus the future Tumen River outlet to the sea, because the Tumen River channel is not deep or wide, although it cannot pass large cargo ships, but small and medium-sized cargo ships can be unimpeded in batches, and it is especially impossible to win by quantity
Generally speaking, whether United States' move is greedy for money or strategic direction, it has nothing to do with us, we are just a reason for United States to ask for money. Even if it is actually targeted, it is Russia that is injured, and naturally Russia rushes ahead and just grabs the wind
China seems to be standing in the middle of the storm, but in fact it has nothing to do with us. As for United States so-called confrontation, it is deeply helpless and ridiculous
PS: It's not easy to create, please don't reprint