Do you still remember the food safety problems exposed by 315 this year?
Each one is shocking!
But how long has it been, and Wang Hai, a well-known anti-counterfeiting blogger, and others found that there was no lotus root in Zhou's powder.
When they found the manufacturer for negotiation, the manufacturer not only had an arrogant attitude, but also spoke directly, and you had no right to confront it.
even threatened: You can go to the city department to complain.
Afterwards, he sent men after them.
The response given by the local market supervision department is even more indescribable.
What's going on here?
How it happened:
On July 1, Wang Hai directly posted on the Internet that there was no lotus root in Zhou's lotus root powder.
On May 27, they bought a lotus root powder from the brand's self-operated flagship store on the e-commerce platform, and after laboratory testing, it was found that the product did not contain lotus root at all.
Then, they bought a lotus root flour product of the same brand offline.
After testing by relevant testing agencies, it turned out that this product also did not contain lotus root, but contained tapioca flour.
And the price of edible tapioca flour and pure lotus root flour is combined, which is 108,000 miles.
At the end of the article, Wang Hai also revealed that Zhou's related honey products were detected as fake many times, and the fact that they did not contain honey was also exposed.
The manufacturer's approach is chilling
As a professional anti-counterfeiter, since Wang Hai dared to openly expose this matter, it was naturally confirmed again and again, and after getting the relevant test certificate, Wang Hai and his party found the manufacturer.
I thought that having evidence in hand would enable manufacturers to realize the seriousness of the problem and give a reasonable solution.
Unexpectedly, the manufacturer did not recognize the evidence they brought at all, and questioned the irregularity of the agency they sent for inspection.
What's even more speechless is that when Wang Hai and the others left, the manufacturer actually let people beat them.
According to the relevant statement issued by the company, it can be seen that the manufacturer has a resolute attitude, believes that the report of professional anti-counterfeiters is untrue, and reserves the right to pursue their legal responsibility.
The market supervision department speaks out
As the matter continues to ferment on the Internet, the Lipu Municipal Administration for Market Regulation issued a notice on July 4.
The report stated that the evidence materials provided by Wang Hai could not be directly used as statutory evidence to prove that Zhou's Shunfa Company's products had quality problems.
However, it is also mentioned in the notice that the raw materials and finished products of the relevant products mentioned in the video will be sealed in accordance with the law, and then commissioned a testing agency with corresponding qualifications to conduct testing.
More people testified in solidarity
Some netizens said that they were hospitalized for eating Zhou's fake lotus root powder, and for this reason, they also reported to the police and called 12345 to complain.
There is also a recording of the phone call replied by the Market Supervision and Administration Bureau.
In addition, another netizen said that he had worked in a food factory in Lipu for ten years, and lotus root flour was produced from tapioca flour.
Netizen views:
Many netizens recognize and support Wang Hai's anti-counterfeiting behavior, and everyone thinks that professional anti-counterfeiters like Wang Hai should take on more important positions.
At the same time, the problem of food fraud occurred, and netizens pointed the finger at the Municipal Supervision Bureau.
Netizens believe that the Market Supervision Bureau is very responsible for such a thing, and if they usually make a difference, how can it be the turn of the fake to do this.
Write at the end:
Why are food safety problems exposed every year?
If there is a problem with what people eat in their mouths, then what else can reassure them?
If the fakes are not removed, how can the real thing enter the mouths of the people?
For companies without conscience, whether it is consumers or relevant departments, they must show their own attitudes and tell them with practical actions that the opportunity to make mistakes is only once, and there is no second time.
However, as long as the relevant departments achieve this level of punishment, I believe that the food safety problem will be greatly improved.