Welcome all tasters to browse, thank you for your likes and attention!
Today's topic: Is "no more than three generations rich" a self-imagination or self-comfort for the poor?
The current society is indeed more interesting, and it is different from the gameplay of ancient China, but I don't agree with the long-term maintenance of the 300 generations, which is somewhat similar to the conclusion of Fukuyama's history. This society is made up of people, and there is a cost to maintain social stability, and once the cost is too high to maintain the functioning of society, various problems will arise.
That's right, and the countless examples around it illustrate it, beyond three generations are in the minority. Moreover, according to my observation, due to the decline in the general ability of the second generation, but the social status is generally higher than their own ability, which has an extremely adverse impact on the third generation, so the three generations are generally prone to deviate from the three views.
According to historical records, in the Tianbao period, the mansion of Li Jing, a famous general in Chang'an, was taken over by the emerging Yang family. The family temple of the Li Jing family turned out to be the stable of the Yang family, which is really embarrassing.
I think the moral heirloom can be an example of Wen Tianxiang, his own son died without descendants, and his daughter's descendants also disappeared, which can be said to be the last in blood, but his nephew passed on the incense for him, and the Wen family has passed on his great spirit from generation to generation, and today it has also become a very strong clan, not to mention becoming a hero in everyone's mind, which is called moral heirloom.
The origin of the saying that there are no more than three generations of wealth is not this, it comes from an ancient saying: moral heirlooms, more than ten generations, poetry and books are cultivated and read heirlooms, and rich heirlooms are only three generations
If there is really such a good thing as being rich for three generations, then there is no dynastic cycle law. Rich for only three generations, it is nothing more than saying that no matter how big the local tyrant is, the wealth cannot benefit the exponentially growing bloodline branches.
The Zhou Dynasty was able to be feudal because of the Western Zhou Dynasty, the population was relatively small, the environmental development was insufficient, and the vassal states were mostly point-shaped, either large or small, and in the later period, when the environment was developed enough, it was a surface, and the boundaries were connected together, and there were many disputes.
Is his own children a weapon? I know one has bipolar disorder and the other went to Shijia Hutong Primary School.
He writes about his children in the book, and indeed has a bipolar disorder, and he focuses on the pain experienced in the process of treatment and the knowledge and awareness of mental illness that has been gained through this experience
This is also the situation that the knowledge of ancient society was not popularized, and now it is more difficult to pass on social morality for ten generations!
Dear Officers!
Having read the above;
I wonder what you think?
We look forward to hearing from you in the comments below!