Before reading this article, in order to facilitate your discussion and sharing, please click "Follow", which can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
#头条创作挑战赛#
The content of this article has reliable sources of information, and relevant sources are added at the end of the article
Due to the headline revision,Added the ad unlock function,When the ad is opened,Wait for 5 seconds,You click the close button in the upper right corner of the small one to make a fortune,You can continue to read my article,Thank you for your understanding
[Preface]
Freedom of speech has always been something that people are pursuing and aspiring to, and now it seems that most of it has been realized, but now people seem to have a misunderstanding of the definition of these four words.
In recent years, self-media has slowly developed and grown, and now it has become a very important way to disseminate information, which has long surpassed the previous paper communication media.
Therefore, there are many discussions on the Internet about the Internet celebrity blogger who was banned some time ago, and many people have different views.
[Establish the right values]
This rumored Internet celebrity who has been banned has a nickname on a video platform called a person's Shakespeare.
His qualifications on the video are emotional bloggers, but what he says is generally current affairs news that is more popular in society now.
In response to these hot events, he can express a lot of sharp opinions every time, and his perspective on things is very unique.
The language expression is relatively fluent, and the observed things are relatively comprehensive, which can be described as a well-known dare to speak on this online platform.
In fact, before that, I always felt that the remarks made by this blogger in response to some events were quite upright, and the three views were relatively correct.
But a recent video is a little shaken, and I have this idea, that is, the video that led to his ban is about the national plot.
This video collided with a video he had previously posted, and for a moment the stuff he had posted was a bit untenable.
It is true that his remarks are not the mainstream of the current ideology, and he clearly stated that he regarded Japan as an enemy, and was accused by an official that this kind of remarks were not a criticism of Chinaism, but racial discrimination.
His videos strongly express his anger and hatred, coupled with the fact that his fans have reached tens of millions, which has a strong sense of guidance.
It also led to the occurrence of this ban, according to the official, they believe that the greater the ability, the greater the responsibility, and they can't just think about eating the traffic of the Internet.
And let's not look at these things published by the official public, let's talk about our own experience, if a person's concept has been formed.
For example, I am a Chinese, and I understand China's more than 100 years of humiliating history, so I will more or less have some national complexes.
And this philosophy has never changed in the years since I had my memory and when I started studying history, no matter who asks me.
I won't have such a strong sense of conflict in the publication of my own remarks like this blogger, because these are the truest thoughts in my own heart.
Instead of some copy he deliberately wrote in order to post a video, those can be said not to be his own thoughts, but the thoughts of the audience that he guessed.
So some people began to wonder if he really wrote these things himself? Is there such a big deviation in a person's successive changes in thinking?
[Plagiarism suspicion]
As we all know, there are too many people in the self-media industry now, and the people who want to enter the industry are unlimited, but those ideas that will be popular are limited.
Therefore, there is a very popular phenomenon on the Internet now, that is, following the trend, borrowing, and saying it directly and ugly, that is, plagiarism.
It's all done in the same line, you look at mine, I'll see yours and then put it together and fuse it to become a new thing, and it can still catch fire.
There are really no ideas, just look at what the audience said in the comment area, which of the following sentences has the most likes, which proves that they want to express the meaning and support the most people.
Then the next time you write a copy, you will use this sentence to get more recognition, when this blogger writes a copy that is in line with your philosophy.
You will feel that this blogger Sanguan is a very good person, and what he publishes is worth a look, you can pay attention to it.
After this Internet celebrity blogger was banned, it caused a lot of discussion. There is also a discussion on another platform specifically about the topic of his title.
One of the most popular ones directly pointed out that many of his copywriters were plagiarized from other platforms, which is now the answer under a very well-known software topic.
Because I'm also using this software, there are indeed a lot of bigwigs who make their own remarks, both in logic and writing, which are very good and benefit a lot.
So some of his remarks have been confirmed, and they are indeed from the comments section of the software or the answers to the questions of the people on it.
Some even didn't even change the punctuation marks, and directly became the copywriting he preached when he made the video, plus the soundtrack that belonged to him, and the background that belonged to him became his own opinion.
When he was popular, many people said that he was a stitching monster, but this statement was not humane at the time, because he was very popular and hot.
Now that he has been banned, coupled with the fact that an official has come out to accuse him, it means that he has now completely reached the lowest point since he made short videos.
Coupled with the examples listed, they are indeed true and can be found out, and those copywriters are indeed not ideas he came up with by himself.
He borrowed or copied it from other social platforms, not his own mainstream ideas, but he stole them.
In response to the fact that he was banned, many people felt that he was finally banned, and they had long looked down on him, and they had long felt that these things he published were not quite right.
And some people feel that he is one of the few people in this society who dares to speak out, and they feel very sorry.
As for what I want to say? I would say that there are 1000 Hamlets for 1000 people, and all things come to relative conclusions.
But one thing, the most important one, is that he can't stir up people's emotions and deliberately provoke people's anger in order to divert traffic.
If you do this, as this official account said, he will definitely be eaten by the traffic.
Information sources:
Weibo ———— Observer.com spoke
END