Lead
"China's next step will be to achieve a manned landing on the moon, which is unacceptable to the United States, and they cannot lose to China in the field of space."
The US congressman went so far as to make nonsensical nonsense about China's space development, saying that "the United States cannot accept it" and that the United States must "strengthen and expand space exploration."
What is going on with the American politicians who have panicked about China's development and are hostile to the "national system" after a period of "self-consolation in the air"?
What is the shady intention behind this move of the United States?
In the face of the difficulties and resistance of the United States, how should the mainland respond?
Unacceptable.
It is true that the United States has made brilliant achievements in the space industry, and the US space industry can also be said to be "hanging in the world," but it is precisely this kind of "hanging in the world" that gives the United States a natural advantage in both its national strength and comprehensive strength.
This is also the situation that the United States has shown in the space industry, but with the advancement of the mainland's unmanned lunar landing program and manned space program, the gap between the United States and the mainland in the space industry has gradually narrowed.
And this also made the United States aware of the danger of China's gradual rise in the space industry, so it obstructed and rejected it.
Not only that, in 2013, the United States also passed a so-called "Wolf Act" to prevent the United States from cooperating with China in space, which exposed part of the United States' face and let the outside world see that the United States was behind itself.
The passage of the Wolf Act officially stemmed from the launch of China's Chang'e-3 lunar probe and its landing on the lunar surface for scientific exploration.
How can the United States accept the successful placement of a flag on the lunar surface and the rapid photographing and detection of the probe, which made the United States "work long overdue" in the sensational "Apollo Program"?
As a result, Canadian Congressman Wolf proposed this bill, through which the United States can block cooperation between the United States and China in the space industry on the grounds of "national security."
At the same time, the law's sanctions on Chinese companies in the United States restrict the number of high-tech products exported by the United States and their visits, which will lay an absurd and contradictory foundation for their already "pursuit of freedom" because of so-called "national security", and once again carry forward their "national system" style.
The United States has set up this "bill" in the name of "national system" for China, but in fact it is to "crack down" on China in the space industry, so that while achieving the political goals of the United States, it can also "make a profit" from China's space industry.
This can also be seen from China's request for samples collected by the mainland on the moon from the United States, China not only did not "make a step" in the position of the political core, but also did not "make a step" in the field of life, China has shown a tough relationship in the political field, and China is also not a troublesome existence in the aerospace industry.
If the United States really wants to get serious, our technology stocks and core stocks are not in line with the United States, so it is still in vain for the United States to want to benefit from it.
Space overlord.
It is precisely because the United States, a country with a "national system," has its own core position that it is very confident that it will "regard itself as a great power" wherever it goes.
However, with the gradual advancement of the mainland's unmanned lunar landing program and manned space program, not only the international space community, but even the countries that have been "led by the nose" by the United States have invariably begun to be tempted when they see the progress of the mainland's space industry.
This "hegemon" identity of the United States has always existed naturally in the international community, and when a new power emerges, it will certainly bring great challenges to its hegemonic status, and the United States understands this.
However, the United States just does not want to see other countries develop better than them, so it wants to seek its own interests in the development of these countries, especially in China's space industry.
We have made up our minds that since we have our own place in the international community, we must let foreign countries know that this is our foothold, and we will not allow foreigners to "point fingers" at it.
It can be seen how despicable and shameless the United States is, first obstructing and rejecting China's development in the aerospace field, and then using "national security" as an excuse, and then wanting to reap benefits from it, and at the same time wanting to "get a piece of the pie" in China's development.
These practices are not credible, it's like if you don't bully me, we can be friends, but once you show off your power in front of me, then we fight, is this considered a credible behavior?
Some say that this is the essence of "struggle", but as representatives of the "state", their behavior has gone beyond the "scope of struggle" and wants to "trample on others".
America's double standard.
The United States has a program called Artemis, which is mainly aimed at being able to send humans to the surface of the moon by 2024 and get the "first" humans on the moon.
This seems to be an "expedition" for the "lunar border" that women have never set foot in, but behind it is the rejection of other countries in the style of the American "national system".
The Artemis plan in which the United States excluded Russia and China, and at the same time, the United States planned to wait until humans landed on the moon to exploit and utilize the resources on the lunar surface, which made this "plan" of the United States even more ill-intentioned.
However, one of the series of practices of the so-called "Artemis" plan of the United States is an acknowledgment that "strength is invincible", and at the same time, it is also the sadness of "love of face" and "inferiority".
Why?
If the American expedition wants to reach the surface of the moon for exploration, it must have personnel to settle on the moon, and to settle on the moon, it must first build a house, and then have to live with "living utensils".
However, there are enough resources on the moon to "ignite interest," such as fuel, oxygen, and water, and the United States wants to "smallen" the exploration funds and let "most" of the belongings go directly to the moon, but this is "without going through the mind" and at the same time "without going through morality." Therefore, the "technology" of the United States in this regard is "unexpectedly invincible."
What makes people even more infuriating is that the United States' "nationwide system" approach has made it more and more competitors in the aerospace industry, and the more it sees itself in this regard, it is inevitable that it wants to "steal the show."
It is precisely by virtue of its own efforts that China has further expanded the "territory" of the space industry and is leading mankind to a "new journey of exploring the universe".
When the United States was in the "achievement" and "brilliant" stage of China's space exploration, it was "pointing fingers" at the side, and this made people wonder whether to "applaud" or "not applaud."
However, what the United States has "overlooked" is that the mainland's space industry is independent and self-reliant, and we will accept foreign space cooperation, but the principle of peaceful use must be "equality and mutual benefit," otherwise there will be no value in cooperation.
The United States does not seem to have "brains" on this point, and on the one hand it is "quibbling" on the mainland's space exploration, and on the other hand, it is "ambitious" on the mainland's space exploration.
epilogue
The mainland's space industry has developed independently, and the mainland will not be forgotten and will not allow anyone to forget this.
We are not surprised that the United States has adopted a "hostile" attitude toward the development of the mainland's space industry, but we will not change this attitude for the sake of such an attitude, and this is also something that the United States needs to "recognize."