It is not easy to create, in order to bring you a better reading experience, please use your little hands to click "Follow", I will update you with entertainment information every day.
The controversy caused by Liu Yifei's new TV series "The Story of Rose" can be described as boiling and has become the focus of heated discussions among many viewers and industry insiders.
This drama has attracted much attention from the beginning, after all, Liu Yifei's joining has made the audience have great expectations for it. The first thing that has to be mentioned is the similarity between it and "Camp with Love" starring Bai Lu.
This similarity is not only reflected in the setting of certain plots, but also in the overall story structure and emotional direction. When the audience watches, they will inevitably compare the two dramas, and this comparison undoubtedly magnifies some of the shortcomings of "A Story of Rose". For example, in the portrayal of characters, there may be some overly stereotyped places in both, which makes the audience feel that they lack freshness and uniqueness.
And the so-called "destroying the three views" plots in the plot of the play are the core of the controversy. The development of some plots and the behavior choices of the characters in the play make the audience call it difficult to understand and accept. For example, the handling of some emotional relationships seems extremely hasty and unreasonable, as if they are forcibly set to promote the plot, which not only makes the story seem stiff, but also greatly affects the audience's viewing experience.
For example, the protagonist may be unprincipled and capricious in his feelings, or unscrupulous in order to achieve a certain goal, and these episodes make the audience feel a strong sense of discomfort when watching, and even question the values conveyed in the play.
The presentation of the workplace plot has also caused a lot of controversy. The workplace environment and the performance of the characters in the workplace shown in the play were pointed out by the audience to have serious problems that are out of touch with reality. Some characters' actions and decisions in the workplace appear to have no emotional intelligence at all, far from the complexity and nuances of the real workplace.
For example, there may be characters who make inappropriate remarks or do things that are completely inconsistent with the rules of the workplace in the workplace, which makes it difficult for the audience to resonate with them when watching, and even feels a little ridiculous. This kind of portrayal that is detached from reality not only greatly reduces the credibility of the plot, but also makes it difficult for the audience to really immerse themselves in it.
Another problem that makes the audience quite criticized is the frequent advertising placement in the play. These blunt advertising insertions have seriously damaged the coherence and smoothness of the plot, and brought the audience a very poor experience of watching the drama. The audience's original desire to immerse themselves in the plot and enjoy a wonderful story journey is undoubtedly irritating when they are constantly interrupted by these abrupt advertisements. These advertisements seem to be promoting the existence of some bad behaviors and plots in the play, making the audience dissatisfied with the plot and adding antipathy to the advertising placement.
When the audience came with expectations, but encountered these problems, the disappointment can be imagined. So, how should we view such a controversy? First of all, we need to be clear that every work cannot be perfect, and there will be problems of one kind or another. We cannot categorically dismiss the controversy caused by "The Story of the Rose". We should analyze and look at it from a more rational and objective perspective.
From the perspective of script creation, screenwriters should pay more attention to logic and rationality when conceiving the plot. The coherence and acceptability of the story itself cannot be overlooked just for the sake of novelty and excitement. For those circumstances that may cause controversy, it is necessary to carefully consider their necessity and reasonableness, and avoid situations that "ruin the three views" too much. At the same time, in the portrayal of workplace plots, we should deeply understand and study the operation and rules of the real workplace, and strive to truly restore the ecology of the workplace and the behavior patterns of the characters. In this way, the audience can have a stronger sense of substitution and identity when watching.
They also have an important responsibility for the performance of the actors. Actors need to bring out the character's personality and emotions vividly through their performances, so that the audience can truly understand and accept the character's behavior and choices. If the actor's performance is not in place and cannot convince the audience, then it will also lead to a decrease in the credibility of the plot and cause controversy.
As for the issue of ad placement, producers and advertisers should pay more attention to ways and means. The audience's experience cannot be sacrificed just for the sake of commercial gain. Advertising placement should be more subtle and natural, organically integrated with the plot, rather than rigidly inserted. Only in this way can we achieve commercial goals without affecting the audience's viewing experience.
For the audience, we should also maintain an open and inclusive mindset. Although we have our own expectations and requirements for our works, we must also understand the difficulty and diversity of creation. In the face of controversy, we can express our views and opinions positively, but not too extreme and emotional. At the same time, we also want to give the works and creators a certain amount of room to grow and improve.
In a broader sense, the controversy over "The Story of Roses" also reflects some of the general problems that exist in the film and television industry today. For example, how to better balance the quality and artistry of the work while pursuing commercial interests; how to keep the logic and rationality of the story while innovating and breaking through; How to guide the audience to establish correct values while meeting the needs of the audience, etc. These problems are not only faced by "The Story of Rose", but also the entire film and television industry needs to think about and solve together.
In the future of film and television creation, we hope to see more excellent works come out. These works should not only have wonderful plots and excellent performances, but also pay attention to the connotation and value of the story. They should be able to provoke the audience to think, convey positive values, and also bring pleasure and enjoyment to the audience. Only in this way can the film and television industry truly achieve sustainable development and win the long-term support and love of the audience.
As for the controversy of "The Story of the Rose", we should look at it with a more rational and objective attitude. We need to see both the problems and the progress and potential. Through in-depth analysis and reflection on these controversies, we can provide useful reference and inspiration for future film and television creation. I believe that with the joint efforts of everyone, the film and television industry will usher in a better tomorrow. Let us look forward to more excellent film and television works that will continue to emerge and add more excitement and fun to our lives.
We also can't ignore the important role of the audience in this process. Audience feedback and evaluation are an important driving force for the development of the film and television industry. Producers and creators should listen carefully to the voices of the audience, actively respond to the concerns of the audience, and constantly improve and refine their work. Only in this way can we truly achieve interaction and resonance with the audience, and create excellent works that meet the needs and expectations of the audience.
We should also strengthen the supervision and guidance of the film and television industry. The government and relevant departments should formulate more perfect policies and regulations to standardize the development order of the film and television industry and prevent the emergence of some undesirable phenomena. At the same time, we should also increase the support and rewards for outstanding works and creators, encourage more people to devote themselves to film and television creation, and contribute to the prosperity and development of the film and television industry.
As an important carrier of cultural communication, the influence of film and television works should not be underestimated. We hope that every film and television work can shoulder social responsibility, convey positive energy, and guide the audience to establish correct values and outlook on life. Only in this way can our film and television industry truly realize its due value and significance, and make positive contributions to the progress and development of society. Let us work together for a better future for the film and television industry.