laitimes

One of my micro headlines is completely different from what the author wrote, and the headlines also said that I had violated the rules, saying that there was similar content that was posted earlier. I was deducted five points of credit, and I appealed

One of my micro headlines is completely different from what the author wrote, and the headlines also said that I had violated the rules, saying that there was similar content that was posted earlier. I was deducted five points of credit, I appealed, and was rejected by the headlines. That is to say, I am the truth of the violation, and the appeal is invalid and failed. The headlines are really unreasonable, and there is no fairness at all. [Anger]

One of my micro headlines is completely different from what the author wrote, and the headlines also said that I had violated the rules, saying that there was similar content that was posted earlier. I was deducted five points of credit, and I appealed
One of my micro headlines is completely different from what the author wrote, and the headlines also said that I had violated the rules, saying that there was similar content that was posted earlier. I was deducted five points of credit, and I appealed
One of my micro headlines is completely different from what the author wrote, and the headlines also said that I had violated the rules, saying that there was similar content that was posted earlier. I was deducted five points of credit, and I appealed
One of my micro headlines is completely different from what the author wrote, and the headlines also said that I had violated the rules, saying that there was similar content that was posted earlier. I was deducted five points of credit, and I appealed