Hello readers and friends! I'm Po talking about the topic, and the topic I bring to you today is: After reading my views, everyone is welcome to actively discuss in the comment area.
Military marriage carries a special responsibility and mission, it is not only a union of two people, but also a commitment to the security of the country and the people. The existence of the crime of sabotage of military marriage is aimed at maintaining the stability and discipline of the military and safeguarding the rights and interests of military personnel to ensure that they can devote themselves fully to the cause of national security. Civil marriage, on the other hand, is more based on the feelings and wishes of both parties, and the law has correspondingly protected the rights and interests in the marriage, so there is no need to create a special crime of "sabotaging civil marriage". Of course, sabotage of civil marriage is also immoral.
Let's take a look at the real sharing and evaluation of netizens.
If you return triumphantly, I will be the wife of a hero. If you die heroically, I am the fiancée of a martyr. If you are injured or disabled, I am a good friend of the disabled.
I don't think there's a need for a verbal fight, just let women go to war together like South Korea. It's equal.
If personal interests are not protected, how can we talk about national interests? The Marriage Law protects civil marriages!
At present, the mainland does not have a majority of conscripts, but professional officers and non-commissioned officers are the majority, and many conscripts have not reached the age of marriage at all, and they still take care of the entire army.
There are many occupations that live separately in the two places, such as geological exploration, such as road construction, and even the vast majority of migrant workers live separately in the two places.
The metaphor is easy to understand, the eldest brother is doing the decoration
In other words, important national scientific researchers or teachers who volunteer to teach, they may only go home once in a few years, and it is easy to be taken advantage of, and scientific researchers may not be able to contact their families because of confidentiality.
I would like to ask you what it is like to be a defense lawyer to go to a military court to fight a lawsuit and face the prosecution of the military procuratorate.
I don't have the conditions for marriage, but I just want to maintain a marriage, and then I'm not very willing to use inducements, so it's very meow
If a military member has gross negligence, he can get a divorce, and if he doesn't want to, he can get a divorce, but you can't cheat while saying that he thought about it.
A stone fell down on the Great Wall and crushed a group of people, and no one stood under the Great Wall.
One of the conditions for the crime of sabotaging a military marriage is knowing that the other party is a military spouse. I don't know if it doesn't count
That's exactly what the law says. But it seems that it is a military court that will judge this, and the specific interpretation power belongs to the military court. You know.
After reading the comments and shares of netizens, it suddenly dawned on me
What do you think about this while watching the article? Feel free to share your insights in the comments section! See you in the comment section.