Some researchers say that humans evolved from fish, but I personally think this view is absurd

Some researchers say that humans evolved from fish, but I personally think this view is absurd

Some researchers say that humans evolved from fish, which I personally think is absurd, and this view is not supported by reliable evidence! Here's why:

In the long history of human exploration of the origin and evolution of life, various theories have emerged one after another, among which the hypothesis of human origin is particularly eye-catching. In recent years, some researchers have put forward the idea that humans evolved from fish, which has undoubtedly sparked widespread discussion and controversy in the academic community and the public. However, in my opinion, there are many irrationalities in this view, which require in-depth analysis and discussion.

1. The basic principles of biological evolution

Biological evolution refers to the process in which organisms gradually develop and evolve and form new species over a long period of geological time under the action of mechanisms such as heredity, variation, natural selection and isolation. This is a fundamental principle in biology that reveals the sources of biodiversity and complexity. However, the simple reduction of humans to fish is an evolutionary product ignores the complexity and diversity of biological evolution.

2. Differences in physiological structure between fish and humans

There are significant differences in the physiological structure between fish and humans. Fish are aquatic animals that possess special organs and structures that are adapted to life in the water, such as fins, scales, and gills. Humans, on the other hand, are terrestrial animals, and we have organs and structures that adapt to life on land, such as limbs, lungs, respiration, etc. How have these differences been overcome and merged in the course of evolution? This is a question that needs to be studied in depth.

3. Kinship between humans and other terrestrial animals

In addition to fish, humans are also closely related to other terrestrial animals. For example, we have a high degree of similarity with primates in terms of genetics, physiological structure, and social behavior. These similarities suggest that humans may have shared a common ancestor with other terrestrial animals during evolution. In contrast, fish are more distantly related to humans. Therefore, to reduce humans simply to the evolutionary product of fish is to clearly ignore this important fact.

4. Fossil evidence and results of genetic studies

Fossil evidence and genetic studies provide us with important clues about the evolutionary history of organisms. Through the study of fossils and genes, we can understand the evolutionary relationships and evolutionary processes between different organisms. However, in the available fossil evidence and genetic findings, we have not found enough evidence to support the idea that humans evolved from fish. On the contrary, the evidence is more supportive of the kinship between humans and other terrestrial animals.

5. The uniqueness and diversity of human culture

In addition to the biological evidence, we can also explore the origin and evolution of human beings from a cultural perspective. Human culture has a unique diversity and complexity that is unmatched by other living beings. Humans are capable of creating and using complex systems of language, writing, and symbols to transmit information and knowledge; We are able to develop various art forms to express our emotions and thoughts; We are also able to establish complex social structures and institutions to maintain social order and stability. These uniqueness and diversity suggest that humans may have gone through different paths and processes in their evolution than other organisms.

6. A critical analysis of the idea that humans evolved from fish

In response to the view that "humans evolved from fish", we can critically analyze the following aspects:

This view is not supported by sufficient evidence. Neither fossil evidence nor genetic findings have found sufficient evidence to support this view. On the contrary, the evidence is more supportive of the kinship between humans and other terrestrial animals.

This view ignores the complexity and diversity of biological evolution. Biological evolution is a complex and lengthy process that involves the interaction and evolution of multiple species. Reducing humans to the evolutionary product of fish ignores this complexity and diversity.

This view contradicts the uniqueness and diversity of human culture. Human culture has a unique diversity and complexity that is unmatched by other living beings. Reducing humans simply to the evolutionary product of fish does not explain this uniqueness and diversity.

To sum up, there are many irrationalities in the view that "humans evolved from fish", which requires in-depth analysis and discussion. We can conclude through the analysis of the basic principles of biological evolution, the differences in the physiological structure of fish and humans, the kinship of humans with other terrestrial animals, the results of fossil evidence and genetic research, and the uniqueness and diversity of human culture

Humans did not simply evolve from fish, but gradually evolved and formed new species in the long process of evolution. We should respect scientific facts and reject opinions and hypotheses that are not supported by evidence. At the same time, we should also keep an open and exploratory mind, and constantly pursue new knowledge and discoveries.

End of article: Personally, I believe that human beings are still evolved from ancient primate apes, not fish!