In life, buying a car is an exciting and headache event:
After all, if you choose the right car, it can be a good partner in your life; But if you choose the wrong one, you're asking for yourself.
This is not a joke, in recent years, many people have learned such a lesson, they said: no matter how rich you are, don't buy these "three types of cars", they are spending money to find guilt!
It's not because they're expensive, it's because there's a lot of holes in the back that really can't be filled.
The first is a car that cannot be questioned and cannot be defended
To put it bluntly, if you buy a car of another brand, if there is a problem, you should protect your rights and defend your rights, and you should complain when you should complain, and there is basically no problem.
But there is a type of car, if you have an accident, netizens not only do not stand on your side, but also denounce you on the whole network.
Either you won't use it, such a good car is wasted; Either it is to emphasize that the version is wrong, who asked you to buy the low-profile one; Or emphasize that it's not the car company's problem, other cars are even worse ...
All in all - the car, there will never be a problem, the problem must be the owner.
The fan base of this kind of car seems to be more fanatical than "militarism", there is no reason to talk about it at all, and even if there is a car accident, they have to criticize the family members for being particularly ignorant, which has brought huge trouble to the car company.
Why did you buy such a car? Aren't you looking for trouble for yourself!
What's even more outrageous is that if you find a TV station to expose it, not only does it not solve the problem. Car companies will also use their strong influence to find your direct leader and directly say: "Someone came to you, give a face." ”
What personal privacy and fairness are basically not worth mentioning in front of such a brand.
It's not so much a business as a religion, because only religion is high, always right, and unquestionable.
Everything in religion is good, even with inferior materials can turn decay into magic, it can beat peers and friends, and it can make materials science, physics, and science no longer exist—hundreds of thousands of cars are more awesome than millions.
The second is cars that sell very poorly.
What does it mean to have extremely poor sales? To put it bluntly, I feel that the car is okay, but it doesn't sell 500 units a month.
Such a car, maybe the discount is very low, the discount is very large, but I advise you, it is better not to buy it - because the risk behind it is not a little big.
After all, the sales volume has reached this level, can it still support normal maintenance? Maybe it's hard!
There is an example of a friend who took the trouble to buy a car at a 7% discount, which seemed to be a big bargain, but the result was miserable.
In less than 3 months, the only local store has closed down, and every time it is maintained, it has to go to the provincial capital.
It's just this problem, after all, the frequency is not high, and the uncomfortable thing is that because it doesn't sell well, and the accessories are relatively few.
There was an accident, and it took a month to get the accessories, which was simply torturous.
However, compared to some car owners, this is lucky, after all, their problems can still be solved, but the efficiency is low.
Some car owners have directly closed down the brand, and they don't know how to solve a series of problems.
This is really not a joke, some time ago I took a WM car, the car machine was completely black, and most of the functions became decorations.
Therefore, no matter how cheap it is and how big the discount is, you should still be cautious when buying a car, and don't buy a car that sells very poorly.
And the third one is, the car that has been converted from oil to electricity
The so-called oil-to-electricity conversion refers to the transformation and development of electric vehicles on the basis of traditional fuel vehicles.
At first glance, it seems that there is nothing wrong, it seems that it is just a different shell, but in reality it is not.
First of all, the oil-to-electric car is unreasonable in terms of design mechanism.
After all, the chassis structure, weight distribution and space layout of the fuel transfer vehicle are very different from the needs of electric vehicles.
The arrangement of the battery pack can explain the problem:
Because the chassis of fuel vehicles usually does not reserve enough space for large battery packs, this often leads to unreasonable battery arrangement and affects the center of gravity and balance of the vehicle.
To put it bluntly, it is such a car, with a maximum of 300 kilometers of pure electric range, and the handling is still average - it is okay to barely do a range extension, don't think about pure electric.
Secondly, there are compatibility issues with the electrical system and control system.
After all, the main consideration of oil trucks is the storage of engine, gearbox, transmission equipment, and other components, and there is not a lot of electrification design.
But the tram is different, it becomes a battery, an electric control and a motor, and a lot of electrical wiring is added.
Directly using the method of oil to electricity may cause problems such as circuit overload and imperfect battery management system.
This can pose safety risks such as short circuits and overheating.
Finally, there is a big security risk.
Due to structural limitations, many parts are not placed reasonably, and in the event of a serious accident, the battery is easy to be squeezed, causing fire or explosion.
Although this layout has been optimized by engineers in terms of structure, it still cannot completely avoid risks.
In general, it is not that there is a prejudice against these "three types of cars", but that there are indeed hidden dangers and risks in actual use.
As an ordinary person, it is better to stay away from these models, which can reduce a lot of unnecessary troubles.