It is always infuriating to encounter a shortage of pounds and pounds when shopping. At this time, I think that the merchant should know that he is wrong, so in the process of being exposed, he also knows that it is his own mistake, and he will be relatively low-key.
But this time, the blogger encountered an incident, and it was also because of the development of the matter that more netizens learned about the story. It turned out that when the blogger told the merchant in person that he was short of two pounds, the merchant was still able to talk freely, such a "calm", and the quality was really moving.
When the blogger asked for help from the marketing staff, he thought that he would be protected by the other party, after all, the blogger's identity at that time was a consumer, and the other party worked in the market, so he should protect the rights and interests of consumers, but somehow, the staff asked the blogger to delete the video.
(The pictures in this article are all from the Internet)
When the blogger is unwilling, the staff takes the blogger's mobile phone, I think for any person, it is intolerable to be taken away from the mobile phone, after all, the mobile phone is a personal property, and there is more personal privacy in it. Everyone pays for travel, and in many cases, they choose mobile phone payment, and it is difficult to live without mobile phones.
After the incident was exposed, the vendors in the mall and the market staff were dealt with, and the staff who snatched the mobile phone was dismissed. Such a finale should be said to be relatively satisfying, after all, the local rights and interests of consumers are still relatively recognized, otherwise they would not have made such a serious disposal.
The blogger's anti-counterfeiting was finally successful, and he did not miss his own rights and interests on the road of rights protection, and everyone was happy. But even so, there are still netizens in the comment area who refuse to forgive, and even some netizens emphasize the fault of taking away the mobile phone.
Obviously this staff member has already paid the price for what he did, why can't they be more generous? In fact, from the staff's point of view, he doesn't want the disgraceful content in the market to be known to the outside world, so he hopes that the other party will delete the video, which is understandable to everyone, but his move with his mobile phone is too domineering, and it is this move that has caused many people to resist, so the revelation has made so many netizens sigh.
This incident may show that the market staff wants to protect the reputation of the market, should not snatch the mobile phone from the consumer's hand, let alone ask the consumer to do the specified behavior, if the staff at that time cooperated with the consumer's appeal and punished the vendor at that time, maybe this matter will not be known to everyone.
The blogger's grievances have intensified people's sympathy for him, and once the sympathetic eyes are released, people's emotions will naturally be rendered. The resistance to the staff is actually their protection of their own consumption in the future, after all, not everyone may be able to become an employee of the market, but everyone is playing the role of consumers.
Perhaps, as netizens emphasized, the nature of snatching a mobile phone is not allowed, nor should it be easily forgiven, because this is not an ordinary contradiction between one or two people, but involves the fact of snatching things.
Although choosing to forgive symbolizes the virtue of generosity, it does not mean that everyone is willing to take the initiative to forgive, after all, bottomless kindness is sometimes not true, good, and beautiful.