Recently, a conflict between urban management law enforcement and vendors in Shenyang, Liaoning Province has once again attracted widespread attention. Speculation and rumours have become more and more exaggerated as they have been spread online. Instead of blindly blaming, we should have an open and rational attitude and a comprehensive and objective understanding of the true course of the incident.
On the day of the incident, the chengguan carried out law enforcement and rectification of the illegal vendors in accordance with the law, but a dispute broke out with a vendor in the process. This process, relying on the fragments and videos circulating on the Internet, is inevitably difficult to fully reflect the truth. After the incident, Shenyang issued a notice in a timely manner and announced that it would release a more complete video recording to explain.
However, before the truth is clear, various theories spread on the Internet have emerged, each based on its own interests. Some netizens claimed that the urban management law enforcement was improper, and some netizens accused vendors of occupying more stalls and other illegal behaviors.
Loading...
What the truth is needs to be more comprehensive and objective. Subsequently, the official released a more complete video as promised, and some of the details reflected in it confirmed that the original statement was only partially true.
For example, the chengguan did not use excessive violence in the process of law enforcement, mainly to discourage vendors from relocating their stalls. One of the vendors occupied multiple stalls in an unruly manner and did not cooperate with the urban management rectification.
The video also shows that the crackdown on the vendors of the chengguan law enforcement officers was not just a confrontation before, but caused multiple provocations to the chengguan. These details are different from some earlier statements, which further confirm that the truth of the incident is difficult to conclude based on certain fragments alone.
The public should approach such incidents with openness and rationality. Blindly inferring accusations is unscientific, and it requires comprehensive verification to reach a more fair conclusion. We should not believe one-sided information taken out of context on the Internet, nor should we arbitrarily characterize.
The full video released by the official, as one of the parties involved, has helped a lot to understand the incident and made up for the lack of original information, which is also the objective and prudent perspective that the public should take.
Of course, the details of the law enforcement process of urban management also need to be improved, such as whether the law enforcement attitude should be too gentle, which is also worth pondering. But when it comes to facts, facts are the last word.
We should not arbitrarily make irresponsible accusations, nor should we be led away by certain one-sided information to exacerbate the public opinion environment. Only by understanding the truth comprehensively and meticulously can we make more fair and rational judgments and reflections.
The real story of the incident is reflected in the full video, which also indirectly shatters some online rumors. The public should not only supervise the institution, but also give the institution the necessary space for trust and understanding. Each of us will inevitably have subjective preconceptions and misleading in our daily life, and only by seeking truth and truth can we finally see the essence of things.
It is understandable that in the early stage of an incident, public sentiment is easy to focus on certain details and one-sided information that they see, and then make subjective judgments. But in the long run, each of us citizens should be responsible for overall rationality and justice.
Only when we look at problems with an open and inclusive attitude can we avoid misleading or misjudging to the greatest extent. As the competent authorities, the government should also strengthen information disclosure and improve the law enforcement rules to give the public more confidence. This incident tells us that the only correct way to solve the problem is to seek truth from facts.
We should be aware that in today's information explosion, the public opinion environment is often easily influenced by individual information or details, resulting in confusion in judgment. The truth is often complex and multi-layered, requiring us to use a rational and objective attitude to understand all aspects in depth. Only by exchanging information and integrating multiple perspectives can we reach a fair and comprehensive conclusion.
This is precisely the principle that should be followed to build a harmonious society. Xiaobian hopes that through this incident, each of us citizens can enhance our consciousness in this regard and earnestly exercise the responsibility and obligation of citizen supervision. At the same time, it is also expected that the institutions will strengthen their transparency and feedback to win more public support.
Jointly creating a social environment of mutual trust and inclusiveness is what we should do. Only in this way will similar incidents not continue to expand because they are misleading, and we will be able to give a just and comprehensive solution to the problem.
This will not only be meaningful for the event itself, but will also be a major step forward in citizen participation and oversight. I believe that as long as we think and revise comprehensively and deeply, our society will be able to grow better.