Text: Looking at history by the column
Edit|Relying on the column to look at history
Source: All of the information stated in this article is based on reliable sources, and the specific information is detailed in the article
Preface
Now that the presidential election in the United States is just around the corner, the Biden administration has repeatedly suppressed China's trade in order to win votes.
In the face of accusations and slander and double standards in the United States, the People's Daily couldn't help but speak out and unveil the fig leaf of the U.S. energy transition.
Biden and Yellen's lies, even many international foreign media can't stand it, what did the People's Daily say? Why did Hua Chunying criticize "sniping" Yellen?
Suppressing China
In terms of curbing and suppressing the development of China's new energy trams, the United States can be said to have spared no effort, and the means are endless.
It is understood that on May 13, Biden announced that he would impose tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, increasing the original 25% by four times, that is, imposing 100% tariffs on electric vehicles on China.
Such high tariffs are undoubtedly a fatal blow to car companies, and the United States almost told us that the United States will ban the import of Chinese trams in the future.
Beijing Daily client, 2024-05-10, "The United States will announce its decision to impose tariffs on China next week? Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Mistakes on Mistakes"
Although it is not said so, the behavior of the United States has made this purpose too obvious, and Chinese trams exported to the United States are not only subject to high tariffs, but also treated differently and purchased without subsidies.
The United States is also supporting the energy transition, and has a strong promotion of electric cars, and there is a certain purchase subsidy policy, but this policy is aimed at China, Russia, etc.
The subsidy clause makes it clear that trams from China, as well as trams that use batteries from the Chinese market, are not eligible to apply for subsidies.
This kind of "anti-Chinese subsidy" behavior is a blatant target of China's trams and curbing China's new energy development, in addition, the United States has repeatedly shouted at China, accusing us of overcapacity.
In the face of the smear of the United States, it is tolerable and unbearable, the People's Daily issued an article to tear the fig leaf of the United States, and Hua Chunying was even more blunt and tough Yellen, criticizing her double-standard remarks.
People's Daily, 024-05-13, "What is the purpose of hyping up China's new energy "overcapacity""
American fig leaf
Looking at the global energy transition, China has long been at the forefront of the world, especially in photovoltaic power generation and new energy trams, which can be said to be far ahead.
This is due to the country's development layout for many years, as well as the implementation of various development policies, and the country's foresight, which has given China countless technological advantages in this technological change.
The United States has always been regarded as a scientific and technological power, and it has also begun to lay out early in the energy transition, not later than China, which can be judged from the development of Tesla in the United States.
However, the development of the energy transition in the United States has so far, but it is not as good as China, a large part of the reason is that the policy implementation is not in place, the United States is a two-party country, whoever succeeds in the election is in power, which means that many of their policies are contradictory and cannot be consistent.
It just so happens that the United States has wavered in the energy transition, resulting in many ideas not becoming a reality, so the United States lags behind China in the transition.
This kind of backwardness, including technology, industrial chain, and enterprise development, is difficult for the United States to accept, and in order to catch up with China as much as possible, the United States has resorted to all kinds of means.
Xinhuanet——2024-04-30——"The United States|Reporter's Observation: The Development of Electric Vehicles in the United States Encounters a "Dead Knot"
In other words, the United States has targeted China so much in the international community, repeatedly politicized bilateral trade, and curbed China's development, in fact, because the United States itself is not good at it, and it does not allow other countries to do it better.
The People's Daily pointed out that the biggest attempt of US trade protectionism is to curb China's development in the field of high and new technology, prevent China's science and technology from going ahead in the world, and slow down China's development.
Another attempt is to help U.S. companies catch up with China while suppressing China, so that the U.S. can make up for the missed development opportunities in the trade war, so that it can lead technological development again.
In front of the United States, even if China is excluded, the domestic new energy tram companies in the United States have not developed rapidly, and technological breakthroughs are not overnight, and only Tesla, the most famous in the United States, can compare with China.
The U.S. hype up China's overcapacity rhetoric is just a fig leaf for the U.S. to lend itself in the energy transition.
Deliberately throwing the blame for its own domestic development difficulties on China in order to divert internal contradictions is a consistent "political manipulation" by the United States, and it is just seeking excuses for the incompetence and wrong economic policies of the Biden administration.
The People's Daily pointed out the reasons why the United States is targeting China, and at the same time, many international media have also seen through the lies of the United States.
Guangming.com, 2024-04-25, "The United States and the West frequently hype China's "overcapacity", and many international media have published articles to refute it"
International rhetoric
South Korea's "Han Nation Daily" said that the accusations of overcapacity in China by US and Western politicians are essentially competing for interests, and deliberately exaggerating before the US presidential election is a political consideration.
Switzerland's Neue Zürcher Zeitung put it more bluntly, saying that the United States should face competition head-on rather than complaining, and that China's overcapacity is actually hypocritical and short-sighted.
The article said that the United States and the West could embark on a path of cooperation and development with China to benefit consumers, but the United States went the other way.
In fact, China's production capacity is not only not excessive, but even far from enough for the vast overseas market, and the European market has a high demand for China's new energy manufacturing.
But Yellen deceived herself and did not want to admit it, and was asked in an interview that China has a lot of subsidies, and the United States has billions of dollars in subsidies.
Yellen famously said that the US subsidies are for the so-called national security and are strategic investments in important areas.
The United States can subsidize itself, but China can't, in response to this double standard remarks, on May 13, Hua Chunying directly and publicly replied.
She attacked Yellen in the external media, criticizing Yellen mercilessly, the United States supports industry and subsidizes industry is strategic, but when others do the same, it becomes unfair competition.
Isn't this a typical double standard? If you don't post it, it's fair that I also subsidize, and Lin Jian of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also said that it is not China's "overcapacity", but the United States is anxious and lacks self-confidence.
If China and the United States cooperate and develop, it will be a strong alliance, but the United States insists on going its own way, which makes China very disappointed.
Observer.com, 2024-05-13, "Yellen Justifies "The United States Does Have Subsidies, But ......", Hua Chunying Online "Translates" American Double Standards"
#头条创作挑战赛#
Disclaimer: The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.
---END---