Ali broke a corruption case: ordinary employees accepted bribes of nearly 100 million
May 15th.
A news about the alleged huge bribery of employees within Alibaba Group shocked all sectors of society.
It is reported that in just over a year, the amount involved in the case was as high as 130 million yuan, of which the amount of bribes was more than 92 million yuan, and the degree of greed was staggering.
This case not only exposed serious loopholes in the company's internal supervision, but also aroused widespread public concern about the anti-corruption work of large enterprises.
It is understood that the employee took advantage of his position to conduct power-for-money transactions and accept bribes in many links such as the entry review.
Most of these bribes came from the settled merchants, but also some internal employees engaged in bribery for personal gain.
In just over a year, in such a short period of time, the amount of money involved can reach such an astonishing amount, which is enough to show the employee's greed for money and disregard for the interests of the enterprise.
According to the data, this employee, Wang, is just an ordinary employee of Ali and an operator of the basic position of the platform.
Within the company, the position is simply too ordinary to be ordinary.
It's not even a middle manager, it's just a junior employee.
Wang is mainly responsible for the approval of the official flagship store of furniture on the e-commerce platform.
All furniture companies that want to open stores on the platform must pass Wang's preliminary examination, otherwise they will not be able to settle in.
This also gave Wang a lot of authority.
Originally, the first trial was just a small power, but it made Wang a business of more than 100 million yuan, which made people feel unbelievable.
Wang is indeed very business-minded, but unfortunately he used it in the wrong place.
The police revealed that the price of Wang's entry into the trial was clearly marked, and a store charged 15 to 200,000 yuan, which is not unacceptable for some enterprises.
This allows them to successfully settle in even if they are not qualified.
In the end, it is up to the consumer to pay for their substandard products!
It is reported that Wang was very careful in the process of committing the crime, and basically did not use his personal bank card to collect money, but because the business volume was much larger than that of his colleagues, he was reported anonymously.
It seems that Wang is indeed a little too greedy, if it weren't for the abnormal business volume, I'm afraid no one would be able to find out about his illegal behavior.
In front of Alibaba, a behemoth company, it is inevitable to hide dirt and dirt.
But a small employee can embezzle nearly 100 million yuan, which is really touching and unimaginable.
At present, the employee has been arrested by the public security organs in accordance with the law and will be severely punished by the law.
The occurrence of this case has undoubtedly had a great negative impact on the reputation and image of Alibaba Group.
As a world-renowned Internet company, Alibaba has always been committed to building a corporate culture of integrity, fairness and transparency.
However, the occurrence of this corruption case has raised questions about the integrity and effectiveness of the company's internal management and supervision mechanisms.
This bribery case of Ali employees is not only an isolated case, but also a warning to the entire business community.
It reminds us that no matter how big or well-known a company is, we cannot ignore the importance of anti-corruption efforts.
Only by establishing a sound internal management mechanism and supervision system, and strengthening employee education and training, can we effectively prevent and curb the occurrence of corruption.
In addition, this case has also triggered public thinking about the construction of a social credit system.
What do you think about this?