The list of winners of the Golden Broom was announced, the director poured oil Yang Mi, and Chen Qiaoen responded with dignity and was praised for his high emotional intelligence

The name of the Golden Broom Award seems to have become the embodiment of some kind of public expectation, not only a slap in the face to the work, but also an awakening to the entire industry.

However, the Golden Broom Awards have not been smooth sailing – it has been fame and controversy at the same time. The outside world has its own opinions on its selection criteria, process and results, and there is no shortage of criticism and doubts, as well as incomprehension and misunderstanding.

However, despite the pressure and slander, the Golden Broom Award still stands, sticking to the original intention of returning movies to the essence of art, and it is this persistence and courage that makes it a force to be reckoned with inside and outside the film industry.

This perseverance and distinctive attitude is the profound label and influence that the Golden Broom Award has given to the film.

The curtain is slowly lifting, and this year's Golden Broom Awards selection has revealed a series of high-profile results.

Although the criticism at the door is inevitably sharp, Chen Qiaoen shows her honesty and pursuit as an actor.

She accepted this evaluation politely and sincerely, and took the time to respond in her busy schedule, and she will continue to improve her acting skills and respond to public expectations with actions.

Among the hot stars such as Ma Li, Liu Yifei, Huang Jingyu and other hot stars, they also witnessed their unexpected encounter with the Golden Broom Award.

Under the flash of the awards, Cheng Qingsong, the founder of the Golden Broom Award, did not shy away from difficulties and expressed his frank opinions.

These seemingly sharp points are not untargeted, but hope that through such reflections, people in the film industry can face up to their own shortcomings and then move towards maturity. Although Cheng Qingsong's words reveal criticism, they also have a heavy meaning of expectation and encouragement.

This phenomenon reflects the desire and expectation of the market and the audience for high-quality dramas, implying that production is indispensable.

The jury of the Golden Broom Awards, despite its skepticism, quietly prompted the performers to tap into their own potential and explore the richness of the work.

The role of the Golden Broom Award goes far beyond a simple awards ceremony, it has become a vane for the artistic pursuit of the film industry, as well as a catalyst for the industry's introspection and growth.

Its existence, although there are criticisms, has undeniable value and importance, forcing every film practitioner to seriously examine their own works.

The positioning of this award has not only attracted attention from inside and outside the industry, but also become a powerful tool for the audience to use for fair criticism.

The audience's intuitive feelings and honest comments have become a powerful voice in shaping the film market, inspiring actors to devote themselves to art with more sincere enthusiasm. This seemingly simple audience feedback is often the force that drives the continuous progress of the film.

It reminds filmmakers that victory lies not in brief applause and glory, but in unremitting efforts and sincere love for art.