As soon as the issue of "high temperature subsidy" was thrown, it was like a northwest wind on a summer afternoon, which made people's hearts feel hot. Your reaction is simply to bring out the small electric fan hidden in the corner of the office, and everyone's voices are blowing out, and there is no ambiguity at all.
First of all, we have to admit that this policy was introduced with good intentions, and it is intended to give a little sympathy to the migrant workers who work hard in the scorching sun or in the sweltering hot workstations without air conditioning. It sounds very heartwarming, after all, even a bowl of cool mung bean soup can give people a little nectar in the hot summer.
But what you said about this situation is quite familiar to me. This subsidy is distributed like a rare meteor shower, obviously there should be, and when you look up, you can't catch a star. Some employers are clearly eligible, but it seems that there has never been such a thing. At the end of the day, it's a matter of execution. Under the policy, it is not difficult to implement, the key is that someone has to catch it, isn't it?
It's like "the boss's business", it's like you said, you have to make people aware of this. You have to let them know that it's not just about "seeing", it's about "acting". Because I don't blush, this policy is also a law, a regulation, not a suggestion. Paying wages on time is a duty, and giving subsidies is a responsibility, and the two things have to be looked at separately.
As for the student who said, "It's good to keep a job", I can understand. It is true that the current economic environment is not easy, but this cannot be an excuse for not implementing policies. It's like being poor can't be rude, and suffering can't be lawless, right?
And then your proposal to "get into a good unit", this is clearly another matter. A good unit is not a good unit, which is not the same thing as complying with the labor protection law. However, it must be mentioned that everyone still needs to learn more and improve themselves, and this truth will never go out of style.
In the final analysis, this high temperature subsidy is like a bottle of Coke, everyone wants to take a sip in the summer, cool and refreshing. But wouldn't it be a pity if it was just put in an advertisement and no one could drink it? What should be is what it should be, rights and interests, and we can't just be "elegant fools" when we have nothing to do, right?
I'm a straight-talker, maybe a little rushed. But for the sake of everyone's rights, this topic has to be brought to the table. Everyone should also be positive, and if something is wrong, you have to point it out. As for saying, "I just won't send it to you", this can't be taken as a joke, it has to be taken seriously.
So, don't stop here, this subsidy is still worth everyone's continued attention, not for the two hundred or three hundred yuan, but for the respect and fairness behind it. After all, no one wants to have a piece of cool in their hearts every summer in addition to being hot. Hey, in the end, it's not easy to work as a worker.