Preface
In this article, we saw Zhang Lan revealing in the live broadcast that Big S sued Wang Xiaofei again, which is the 17th time.
Big S withdrew the lawsuit, and then sued again, and the frequent filing of the lawsuit caused dissatisfaction in public opinion.
Among them, Big S sued Wang Xiaofei for strange reasons such as "revealing the child's name", demanding high compensation.
At the same time, Da S opened a handmade shop for Gu Junye, which seemed to have become part of the livelihood of the two.
These incidents reflect the unusual nature of a family dispute, and also raise concerns about the waste of judicial resources and family relationships.
body
In the disturbance of the entertainment industry, Zhang Lan's revelation in the live broadcast that Big S sued Wang Xiaofei again has attracted widespread attention and discussion.
It is reported that this is the 17th indictment, and it is scheduled to appear in court again on the 20th of this month.
Looking back on the previous situation, Da S withdrew all the lawsuits against Wang Xiaofei, and only a few days later, she took Wang Xiaofei to court again, which is really incomprehensible.
It has been reported that the reason for Big S to withdraw the lawsuit is that Wang Xiaofei is a scoundrel and not worth wasting judicial resources.
However, the subsequent re-prosecution seems to contradict this reason.
The big S, who has attracted much attention in the entertainment industry, suffered a failure in the second instance of an oil painting case, and this result has caused widespread heated discussions.
After the trial, the Taipei District Prosecutor's Office had an in-depth conversation with Da S's mother.
The District Attorney's Office made it clear that the frequent filing of complaints by Big S and his team was in fact a serious waste of valuable judicial resources.
The judicial system is supposed to be committed to handling cases that are truly related to social fairness and justice and are of great significance, but the big S side uses it as a means to repeatedly initiate lawsuits, which undoubtedly puts an unnecessary burden on the judicial system.
Not only that, but the District Prosecutor's Office also made severe accusations against Big S for beating up after losing the lawsuit.
Such behaviour is not only contrary to basic ethical norms, but also shows a lack of respect for the law and judicial process.
Losing the case was supposed to be an opportunity to reflect and examine his own actions, but Big S chose to use improper means to try to turn the situation around, which is really difficult to agree with.
The occurrence of this series of events has made people question more about the style and motives of Big S.
Looking back at Big S's past behaviors, it seems that she can always see her strength and stubbornness in various affairs.
Whether in her love life or in business, she has shown an attitude that does not compromise easily.
This style can spark unnecessary controversy and conflict in certain situations.
For example, in this oil painting case, Da S insisted on filing a lawsuit, perhaps out of excessive attachment to his own interests, and ignored the reasonableness and fairness of the case itself.
She may have been overconfident in her position and point of view, without fully taking into account the situation of the other party and the complexity of the whole matter.
In addition, the motivation of Big S also provokes people to think deeply.
Is her frequent prosecution really to defend so-called justice and rights, or is it just to satisfy her own selfish desires or achieve some personal goal?
This uncertainty of motivation makes it even more difficult for people to understand and accept her actions.
From a broader perspective, this series of behaviors of Big S also reflects the bad atmosphere of some stars in the entertainment industry.
Some celebrities pay too much attention to their own image and interests, and do not hesitate to use various means to achieve their goals.
This behavior not only causes harm to other parties, but also has a negative impact on the values of society as a whole.
Public figures should take on more social responsibilities and set a good example.
Their words and actions tend to receive a lot of attention, so they should be more cautious in their words and actions, and abide by the law and ethical norms.
Instead of trying to maintain their image and interests through improper means like Big S.
For Da S, the failure of the second instance of the oil painting case and the ensuing accusations should be an opportunity for her to reflect and grow.
She needs to take a hard look at her actions and motivations and rethink how she can engage in a more positive and healthy way in the future.
At the same time, it also reminds other celebrities and public figures to always keep in mind their social responsibilities and demand themselves with the right values and moral standards.
Da S's failure in the second trial of the oil painting case and a series of subsequent events have raised deep questions about her style and motives.
This is not only a problem that Big S personally needs to face and reflect, but also a wake-up call for the entire entertainment industry.
It is hoped that the future entertainment industry will pay more attention to ethics and law, and create a positive and healthy development environment.
Among the many reasons for Big S to sue Wang Xiaofei, one is quite strange, that is, "revealing the child's name".
Just because Wang Xiaofei mentioned the child's name in the live broadcast room, Big S demanded that Wang Xiaofei compensate NT$200 million, and also claimed that this was a leak of the child's privacy.
Regardless of whether this reason is justified or not, from the perspective of an ordinary observer, such a claim seems excessive and far-fetched.
At the same time, life on the side of Big S continues.
She opened a handmade shop for Gu Junye, and Gu Junye served as the technical director.
The store sells bags made from old jeans by Mr. Koo for $12 each.
From a business point of view, this may be a new career direction opened up by Big S for Gu Junye, but in the context of this series of events, it is inevitable that people will have various associations and speculations.
I have to say that the dispute between Da S and Wang Xiaofei seems to have fallen into a cycle of cyclical circles.
Repeated prosecutions and responses not only consume the energy and financial resources of both sides, but also make the public feel tired and helpless.
And Big S's puzzling reasons for prosecution make people even more confused about the logic of her behavior.
In real life, people usually seek a more rational and reasonable way to deal with feelings and disputes.
And it doesn't seem like a smart move to solve problems through litigation as often as Big S has.
Not only can it cause harm to both parties, but it can also have an impact on those around them.
The story between Da S and Wang Xiaofei continues, and we can only wait and see how their dispute will develop.
But hopefully, they will be able to find a more appropriate way to resolve their conflicts with each other in the future, instead of being mired in such disputes all the time.
At the same time, I also hope that they can think more about their children, after all, children are the most important link between them.
The process and pictures described in the article are all from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy, without vulgarity and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.