I've always heard that plagiarism on some self-media platforms such as a certain account is very serious, but I didn't pay attention to it. Originally, I thought that those plagiarists should only copy those popular Vs, and there should be no one to patronize those who entertain themselves with tickets, but it turns out that I was completely wrong.
The cause of the matter is this.,On the evening of May 12th.,Because an article I'm writing needs to check the information on a certain degree.,And then I habitually opened a certain degree of search.,As a result, I searched and suddenly found that the title of an article was familiar.,Quickly clicked in and took a look.,It turned out that this article was exactly the same as what I wrote 2 days ago.,That is, on May 11th, there was an article written exactly the same.,Even the title to the picture.,And then to the content is exactly the same., The difference is that I wrote this article and published it on the headlines around 11 o'clock on May 11, and the time when he plagiarized it to a certain account was around 3 o'clock in the afternoon of the same day.
This is a screenshot of the time I and the plagiarist published separately
When I found out that I was plagiarized, I immediately provided my original link to the background of a certain account according to the requirements of the customer service and chose to report, and then on the 13th, the feedback I gave to the background of a certain number was: I said that I had a photo taken with an ID card in hand. I can't figure out why? The evidence is already obvious, why do you need to hold an ID card? However, the platform asked me to do this, so I had no choice but to follow his implementation, so I took a photo of my ID card and filled in the reporting materials again, but the platform told me that I had reported it that day and could not report it again. This makes me a little confused, can I only report a disguised plagiarist once a day?
Feedback to me after the first report
But since the platform requires this, as long as it is implemented according to his requirements, but I am also unwilling, so I asked the background of Toutiao, and provided me with the URL of the Cyberspace Administration according to the background customer service, and finally let me successfully report the plagiarist.
In terms of a certain account, on the third day when I found out that it was plagiarized, that is, on the morning of May 14th, I finally successfully reported the other party in the background of a certain account, and when I was reading it in the afternoon, the plagiarist had already taken the initiative to delete this article.
He took the initiative to delete it
However, the funny thing is that not long after he deleted it, the feedback from a certain account also came, saying that it could not find the plagiarist link I provided. For this reason, I have reason to suspect that it was a certain account that prompted the plagiarist in advance and asked him to take the initiative to delete the plagiarized article, and then gave me feedback that he could not find the link to the plagiarized article.
Baijia number gave me the final feedback
Although I am very dissatisfied with the lag and inaction of a certain account in handling things, in the end, this plagiarist still deleted the plagiarized article. But the result is that I still underestimate the shamelessness of these plagiarists, and on the day that the other party deleted my plagiarized article, that is, at 11:11 a.m. on May 14, I published another article in Toutiao, and in the afternoon I accidentally found an article that was exactly the same as the article I published in the morning, and the publication time was half an hour after I published it in Toutiao.
The time when I and the plagiarist published separately
Although this plagiarism is not the same account as the first time, I still found the connection between the two accounts, one is that the registration location of these two accounts is Jiangxi, and the other is that these two accounts belong to the same MCN organization: Zhongli Culture.
I had no choice but to continue to report, but this time I was also experienced, and I reported the author and the MCN agency at the URL provided by Toutiao, and then reported this article in the background of a certain account, but so far this plagiarist has not deleted this article.
The homepage of the second-time plagiarist
I think I'm definitely not the only author on Toutiao who has been plagiarized by others and moved to other websites, and my advice to everyone is to check whether their works have been plagiarized on other platforms. If you find that you have been plagiarized, you must first go to the background of the website to report it immediately, and then you can also ask the Toutiao background to obtain the website address of the CAC, or you can provide corresponding evidence on the CAC to report the other party. Finally, I would like to give you a suggestion, the first release of Toutiao's rights protection on the whole network must be opened, which is also an important guarantee to safeguard our rights and interests.