Recently, Sister Lang's 5 two-public competition system has sparked heated discussions. In the latest episode of the show, Chen Lijun's group was comprehensively suppressed by seven other contestants and was finally eliminated. This competition system arrangement immediately aroused widespread doubts and dissatisfaction on the Internet, and some viewers pointed out that the program team was suspected of deliberately targeting Chen Lijun and treating her unfairly. The fairness of the competition system and the equal opportunities of the players have become the focus of attention.
The rules of Sister Lang's 5 two-public competition system appeared for the first time in this variety show, and the rule setting made many people question whether it is really suitable for this type of draft. The so-called "two public" competition system means that there are two groups in each period to face off, and the winning group can be promoted, while the losing group will be eliminated. In the form of a "seven-on-one" duel, one player in one group has to single-handedly compete with seven players from another group. Obviously, this is a huge challenge for Chen Lijun's group, and it can even be said that it is too harsh and unfair arrangement.
Is there any obvious unfairness to this format? The explanation given by the program team is that by setting up this difficult competition system, the strength of the players can be tested and a wonderful competition can be created. But the reality is that it is doubtful that there are other purposes and considerations. In the end, variety shows still have to pay attention to entertainment, and the overly difficult competition system may not meet this original intention.
In addition to the question of the competition system itself, the suspicion that the program team was directly accused of manipulating the rules to create topics has also attracted widespread attention. Some of the contestants' families and fans openly expressed their dissatisfaction on social media, believing that the program team deliberately set up this competition system in order to hype up the topic and create conflicts.
Chen Lijun is one of the popular players, and the unfair treatment this time naturally aroused widespread attention. Many viewers believe that the program team is deliberately suppressing her, and even doubt that there are some "small groups" behind the scenes. The audience was skeptical about the fairness of the competition system, believing that the program team might be operating in secret, which affected the fairness of the final result.
In the face of doubts, the program team insisted on responding, saying that everything was carried out in accordance with the established rules, and there was no suspicion of manipulation. But the voices of skepticism have not subsided, but have intensified. Many people think that even if the rules are set in this way, the motives and purposes behind them are worth pondering.
Is it really as the program team said, just to create a wonderful showdown? Or are there other considerations? For example, are there really some "small groups" operating behind the scenes, deliberately creating an unfavorable situation for Chen Lijun's group? These have become the focus of widespread speculation.
Whether Sister Lang's 5 two-public competition system can really be fair and just, and whether there is a suspicion of manipulation, this requires a more reasonable and transparent explanation from the program team. The lifeline of talent shows is to maintain fairness and justice, and any doubts and doubts will affect the credibility of the show.
As a long-term hit talent show, Sister Lang's reputation and reputation are very important. This controversy, if not handled properly, is likely to have a lasting negative impact on the show. It is necessary for the program team to respond to doubts, dispel the doubts of the audience, and make the competition system and process truly transparent in order to regain the trust of the audience.