Will the abolition of the teacher establishment really raise these problems? Let's dive into each of them.
All the teacher training colleges in the country will go out of business, and there is no possibility that anyone will apply for the examination in the future
Is it true that the teaching staff has been abolished, and the teacher training colleges will face such a desperate situation? In fact, this may not be a given. While it is true that the existence of the establishment gives a certain degree of stability and attractiveness, the essence and value of education will not be diminished by the disappearance of the establishment. On the contrary, with the renewal of educational concepts and the progress of society, many new educational models and educational opportunities may emerge. Moreover, the rise of private education and international education has also provided new options and development space for talents who are interested in pursuing a career in education. Therefore, we cannot simply assert that the abolition of the establishment will lead to the demise of teacher training colleges.
All schools in the country immediately became a trade market, teachers came and went freely, there was no binding force, and the children in the classrooms could not see the teachers
Such a description seems too extreme. Even if the number of teachers is abolished, the management and teaching order of schools still need to be guaranteed. Excellent educational philosophies and management models will continue to play a role in ensuring that students receive a high-quality education. At the same time, teachers will continue to stick to their posts and work hard for the growth of children because of their love for education and their sense of responsibility to students.
A large number of teachers flocked to private schools, and excellent teachers became the leaders of private schools
It is undeniable that some teachers may choose to work in private schools or educational institutions for a variety of reasons. But that doesn't mean public schools have lost their excellent teachers. In fact, many teachers are able to give full play to their talents and potential in various types of schools to provide quality teaching services to students. Moreover, as the education market becomes increasingly competitive, private schools and training institutions also need to continuously improve their teaching quality and educational concepts to attract more students and parents.
A large number of minors roam the streets with nothing to do. Books can't afford to read, and those schools that exist, the fees are not generally high. Juvenile delinquency has skyrocketed.
This assumption is clearly not true. First, the distribution of educational resources does not become unfair or unequal as a result of the abolition. The government and all sectors of society will be committed to promoting universal access to education and improving the quality of education. Second, even though some schools may charge relatively high fees, that doesn't mean that formal education is inaccessible to all. In fact, the mainland has a well-established compulsory education system and various funding policies to ensure that every child has the right to education. Finally, concerns about juvenile delinquency are also nonsense. A good education system and social environment play a crucial role in preventing juvenile delinquency.
Illiteracy will increase, and no private school will teach you on a compulsory basis.
This argument is equally untenable. First of all, compulsory education is an important part of the mainland's education system, and both public and private schools must abide by the relevant laws, regulations, and policy guidance of the state to ensure that school-age children and teenagers receive compulsory education for a specified number of years. Secondly, with the development and progress of society, people pay more and more attention to education, and parents are willing to provide more learning resources and opportunities for their children. As a result, the illiteracy rate will not rise significantly as a result of the abolition.
In summary, the abolition of the teaching staff does not necessarily lead to the above problems. On the contrary, it may be an opportunity for reform and innovation in the field of education, prompting us to re-examine and rethink how to better meet the needs of the people for quality education. Of course, any reform needs to be carefully assessed for its potential impact and taken appropriate steps to protect the interests of stakeholders.
However, we must not ignore the challenges and problems that may be encountered in the process of reform. So, how should we respond to possible change? And how can we ensure that the equity and quality of education are not compromised? These questions deserve our in-depth discussion and consideration......
(Note: The above content is a fictional example only and does not represent a true view or position.) ）
Should we be content with the status quo and not try and explore new possibilities? Whether the educational reform is truly conducive to the development of the educational undertaking still needs to be further observed and evaluated. And each of us should actively participate in this process and contribute to our education.
So, what do you think about the abolition of teacher allocation? Is it for or against? What specific impacts and challenges do you see it bringing? Let's think about and explore these questions together!