Loading...
Acoustics makes waves again: the second fermentation of the Mayday lip-tto controversy
In the world of music, Mayday has always been a force to be reckoned with. Recently, however, the band's concert has once again become the spotlight due to the lip-syncing controversy. The blogger's remarks on Weibo were like pebbles thrown into a calm lake, causing ripples.
He pointed out that the farmer did not confirm whether the sound source was correct when he accused Mayday of lip-syncing, and this accusation immediately sparked a big discussion on the Internet about authenticity, integrity, and fan emotion.
The farmer's path to a "music appraiser": the fog of true and false sound sources
The farmer, a self-proclaimed "music appraiser," has been discussing music authenticity on social media. He once pointed out in the video that Mayday used pre-recorded audio sources in the concert, and this "doubt" was like a fire, igniting the emotions of fans.
However, the latest vocalizations of acoustics reveal a more complicated picture: the farmer has not confirmed the authenticity of the sound source, and his concern is about a possible future source replacement, an uncertainty that makes the whole event even more confusing.
Fans out of context: a misunderstanding about the truth
Loading...
Mayday has a huge fan base, and their support for their idols is as strong as a rock. However, in this lip-synching controversy, the behavior of some fans is ridiculous.
They took the words out of context and misinterpreted the farmer's concerns as "admitting to the falsification of the source of the sound", which undoubtedly added a bit of drama to the incident. Netizens ridiculed: "Is this a test of the reading comprehension level of junior high school students?" ”
Mayday's counterattack: the live broadcast is fully open, and the audience is judged
Faced with the accusation of lip-syncing, Mayday chose the most direct way to prove his innocence - live broadcast full open mic. This proposal is like a double-edged sword, both a challenge to oneself and a trust in the audience.
Netizens have a lot of discussions about this, and some people support it, thinking that this is the best way to prove the real singing; Some people also questioned that the live broadcast could not completely eliminate the doubts of lip-syncing.
Official Voices and Apologies: The Truth Behind the Traffic
The statement of the Shanghai Bureau of Culture and Tourism has added an official color to the controversy. However, instead of apologizing for this, Acoustic Science insisted on its position, an act that sparked a new round of discussion on the Internet. Some netizens ridiculed: "This is for the sake of traffic, even the dead duck has learned to have a hard mouth?" "The game between the official and the private sector has made this lip-synching controversy even more complicated.
The music between truth and falsehood
In this Mayday lip-to-singing controversy, true and false sound sources, fan emotions, and official positions are intertwined, forming a complex picture of music. The farmer's worries, the fans' misunderstandings, Mayday's counterattack, and the official voice, every link is full of controversy. The controversy is not only a test for Mayday, but also a challenge to the integrity of the entire music industry. In this unpredictable music world, the line between truth and fiction seems to be blurring more and more, and audiences and fans have become the most direct judges of this controversy.