The audience's complaints caused by the first issue of "Singer 2024" do reflect the audience's expectations and disappointments for the selection of guests and the quality of performances. From the description, we can see that the performances of the different singers elicited different reactions from the audience, both praise and criticism.
For the performance of Canadian singer Faouzia, her treble skills and stage performance really impressed, showing that her musical strength and live control are very strong. The performances of Hailai Amu and Rainie Yang did not meet the audience's expectations, perhaps because their performance style or song selection was not suitable for the format of the live broadcast, or they lacked live performance.
Although Na Ying and Wang Sulong's performances are decent, there are no major mistakes, which may be a stable output for the audience. The American singer Chante_Moore's rich European and American accent brought a different listening experience to the audience and also showed her musical strength.
Finally, the performances of the Second Hand Roses, while unique, can also be too unique for some audiences to find uncomfortable. However, their performances did bring some surprises and highlights to the show.
Overall, the audience's reaction to the first issue of "Singer 2024" was diverse, ranging from praise for excellent performances to criticism of shortcomings. This also shows that the audience's expectations and requirements for music programs are getting higher and higher, and they hope to see more excellent singers and performances in the program.
As for the audience's voice calling for substitution, this is actually the audience's expectation of the quality of the program and their views on the selection of guests. If the show can listen to the voice of the audience and adjust the guest selection and performance form according to the audience's feedback, then I believe that "Singer 2024" will definitely get better and better in the future.