The Privatization Debate: The Intersection of Blind Conformity and Ignorance
In today's cyberspace, there is a constant stream of proponents of privatization, who may think they are fighting for their own interests, but fail to reflect on the far-reaching consequences of privatization. This kind of blind obedience is either ignorance or ignorance, but in any case, it is an irresponsible attitude towards the fate of society.
It is interesting to think that the proponents of privatization include those who are not well-off. Don't they realize that in the tide of privatization, their so-called "interest" is only a short-lived illusion? In today's growing disparity between the rich and the poor, privatization is tantamount to creating the most favorable soil for the concentration of wealth, and those who are already poor can only accept this reality more passively. They may not understand that privatization results in the private appropriation of social resources, which means that they will face a higher cost of living, less welfare protection, and may even lose the basic security of survival.
Moreover, in the era of privatization, individuals are faced not only with material poverty, but also with spiritual poverty. Public ownership may not be perfect, but at least there is some degree of fairness and scrutiny, and people can at least find a sense of belonging and security in it. Privatization, on the other hand, puts everything above the market, where money becomes the only criterion, and people are left alone and at the mercy of the market. In the process, only a few of the beneficiaries gain more wealth and power, while the vast majority struggle between poverty and helplessness.
Even more worrying is the fact that in the process of privatization, it is often the few who already have the resources and power to control everything behind the scenes. And these people are often politicians and businessmen who claim to be "serving the people". They use a variety of means, including public opinion control and financial temptation, to gain people's support, but they are often the only ones who benefit in the end. In the tide of privatization, the people are only passive recipients, they have lost control of their own destiny and are at the mercy of the rich and the government.
Therefore, as an ordinary migrant worker, supporting privatization is tantamount to laying a hidden danger for his own future. In the wave of privatization, they may reap some seeming benefits in a short period of time, but all of this is based on the damage of long-term interests. Privatization will lead to greater wealth inequality and increased social instability, and the ultimate victim will only be those who are already disadvantaged.
Therefore, we should be rational and critical of the proponents of privatization. We should not be blinded by short-sighted personal self-interest, but should look at the pros and cons of privatization from a broader social and historical perspective. Only in this way can we avoid repeating the mistakes of history and create a more fair and just social environment.